22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

:oo C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>. CHAP. XI.<br />

religi<strong>on</strong>, as not <strong>on</strong>ly indistinct, but as no ideas at all, but<br />

mere void ; and urge that pers<strong>on</strong>s are under a mistake in<br />

supposing that <strong>the</strong>y have anything really in <strong>the</strong>ir minds<br />

when <strong>the</strong>y pr<strong>of</strong>ess to entertain <strong>the</strong>se truths, not having,<br />

as it is asserted, any idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. In this way, <strong>the</strong>n,<br />

<strong>the</strong> deeper percepti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> ignorance tends to lessen belief<br />

to set <strong>the</strong>m<br />

in <strong>the</strong> truths <strong>of</strong> religi<strong>on</strong> ; inclining pers<strong>on</strong>s<br />

aside altoge<strong>the</strong>r as truths from which our understandings<br />

are entirely separated by an impassable barrier, and with<br />

which, <strong>the</strong>refore, as lying whoDy outside <strong>of</strong> us, we have no<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cern. 1<br />

Such being, <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> two arguments from human<br />

ignorance, <strong>the</strong> two modes <strong>of</strong> using and applying <strong>the</strong> fact,<br />

<strong>the</strong> questi<strong>on</strong> is, supposing <strong>the</strong> mass <strong>of</strong> men had that dis<br />

tinct and clear percepti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ignorance which analy<br />

tical minds acquire, how would <strong>the</strong>y use it ? Would <strong>the</strong>y<br />

use it for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> deepening <strong>the</strong>ir humility, chas<br />

tising <strong>the</strong>ir curiosity, subduing <strong>the</strong>ir impatience ? Would<br />

<strong>the</strong>y frame <strong>the</strong>mselves up<strong>on</strong> a pattern <strong>of</strong> intellectual sub<br />

missi<strong>on</strong> and be grateful for such a measure <strong>of</strong> insight into<br />

religious truths as Grod had given <strong>the</strong>m ? or would <strong>the</strong>y<br />

use and apply it in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r way, and, struck simply by<br />

<strong>the</strong> force <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trast between <strong>the</strong>ir knowledge in <strong>on</strong>e<br />

department and <strong>the</strong>ir ignorance in ano<strong>the</strong>r, draw from it<br />

<strong>the</strong> impatient inference, that because <strong>the</strong>y did not see <strong>the</strong>se<br />

truths clearly, <strong>the</strong>y did not<br />

disc<strong>on</strong>nected with<br />

see <strong>the</strong>m at all,<br />

<strong>the</strong>m? It is to<br />

and were<br />

be feared<br />

rati<strong>on</strong>ally<br />

that <strong>the</strong> natural impatience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human mind would, in<br />

<strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> instances, lean to <strong>the</strong> latter inference. It is<br />

indeed true, and it is a cheering and c<strong>on</strong>solatory fact, that<br />

we see a broad divisi<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> great analytical minds<br />

<strong>on</strong> this head and that while some have drawn <strong>the</strong> ; argument<br />

for unbelief from <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>of</strong> human ignorance, o<strong>the</strong>rs have<br />

drawn from it <strong>the</strong> argument for faith that to Hume and<br />

;<br />

Hobbes <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>e side we may oppose Butler and Pascal<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. But could we expect that <strong>the</strong> generality <strong>of</strong><br />

men would exert that intellectual self-discipline which<br />

1 This appears to have been Hume s state <strong>of</strong> mind with respect to<br />

religious truths.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!