22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

360<br />

Note IX.<br />

by rejecting <strong>the</strong> natural meaning <strong>of</strong> passages, and <strong>the</strong>n lay<br />

<strong>the</strong> difficulty <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> passages.<br />

NOTE IX. p. 46.<br />

THE first work <strong>of</strong> Pelagius referred to in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>troversy,<br />

is his letter to Paulinus, which appears to have been<br />

written about A.D. 405, during his stay at Rome. Benedic<br />

tine Editors Preface^ c. 1. But Augustine s doctrinal<br />

bias had clearly asserted itself some years before, in <strong>the</strong><br />

book De Diversis Qucesti<strong>on</strong>ibus ad Simplicianum, which<br />

came out A.D. 397 ; and had evidently commenced as early<br />

as <strong>the</strong> book De Libero Arbitrio, which he began to write<br />

A.D. 388. In his Retractati<strong>on</strong>s ( 1. 1. c. 9.) he refers to this<br />

early treatise, with which <strong>the</strong> Pelagians taunted him as<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tradicting his later <strong>on</strong>es <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> freewill, and<br />

shows that, though not c<strong>on</strong>sistently brought out, <strong>the</strong> germ<br />

<strong>of</strong> his ultimate system was to be found in parts <strong>of</strong> that<br />

treatise. He refers particularly to <strong>the</strong> scheme <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> Divine gifts laid down in 1. 2. cc. 18, 19 ; accord<br />

ing to which both those which did and those which did not<br />

admit <strong>of</strong> a bad use (virtutes and potentice] were alike gifts<br />

<strong>of</strong> God. The explanati<strong>on</strong> which he gives in <strong>the</strong> Retracta<br />

ti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> statements favourable to freewill in<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r treatise may be far-fetched ; but such a view as<br />

this is evidently agreeable to his later doctrine. Nor is<br />

Augustine at all a pertinacious interpreter <strong>of</strong> his early<br />

writings in <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> his later <strong>on</strong>es. C<strong>on</strong>sistency has<br />

less charm for him than development as a writer and<br />

thinker ; and he dwells <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> changes he has g<strong>on</strong>e through<br />

with <strong>the</strong> satisfacti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e who believes his later noti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

to be a great improvement in depth and acuteness up<strong>on</strong><br />

his earlier <strong>on</strong>es.<br />

To <strong>the</strong>se two earlier treatises may be added <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>fes<br />

si<strong>on</strong>s, written A.D. 400. A celebrated dictum in this book<br />

da quod jubes, et jube quod vis was <strong>the</strong> first apparent<br />

stimulus to <strong>the</strong> speculati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Pelagius, whom it greatly<br />

irritated. Pelagius ferre n<strong>on</strong> potuit, et c<strong>on</strong>tradicens<br />

aliquanto commotius, pene cum illo qui ilia commemora-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!