22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Note VII. 349<br />

justice.&quot; The result <strong>of</strong> this distincti<strong>on</strong> is, that God, in<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> punishment for imputed sin, inflicts no more<br />

evil than He has a right to inflict where <strong>the</strong>re is no sin<br />

in <strong>the</strong> case. But if <strong>on</strong> such a ground <strong>the</strong> imputati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

sin is rec<strong>on</strong>ciled with our idea <strong>of</strong> justice, what becomes<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> idea itself <strong>of</strong> imputati<strong>on</strong> ? There is evidently no<br />

real imputati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>, no punishment for, ano<strong>the</strong>r s sin, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore this whole mode <strong>of</strong> representing original sin<br />

falls to <strong>the</strong> ground. Taylor says, By reas<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rela<br />

ti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> afflicted to him that sinned, to him it is a<br />

punishment. Why so ? Whe<strong>the</strong>r a certain evil is a<br />

punishment depends <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> ground <strong>on</strong> which it is inflicted.<br />

If it is inflicted <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> ground <strong>of</strong> guilt, actual or imputed,<br />

it is punishment; if it is inflicted simply jure Domini /,<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> ground <strong>of</strong> that right which <strong>the</strong> Maker <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

world has over <strong>the</strong> lives and fortunes <strong>of</strong> His creatures, it<br />

is not punishment, but Providence. But is Taylor still<br />

and lie<br />

unwilling to aband<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> punishment,<br />

suggests a form <strong>of</strong> punishment which, he thinks, is not<br />

liable to any charge <strong>of</strong> injustice. In Adam we are made<br />

sinners, that is, treated ill or afflicted, though ourselves<br />

be innocent <strong>of</strong> that sin, ivhich was <strong>the</strong> occasi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> our<br />

being used so severely for o<strong>the</strong>r sins, <strong>of</strong> which we were,<br />

not innocent ]). 4. God inflicts pain up<strong>on</strong> us, <strong>the</strong>n ;<br />

which pain is punishment, because such pain is greater<br />

than it would have been but for Adam s sin ; we are not<br />

punished for Adam s sin, but we are, in c<strong>on</strong>sequence <strong>of</strong><br />

Adam s sin, punished worse for our own sins. But <strong>the</strong><br />

difficulty <strong>of</strong> punishment is not at all lessened by this<br />

artifice <strong>of</strong> attaching <strong>the</strong> to<br />

punishment<br />

our own actual<br />

sins in <strong>the</strong> first place, and <strong>on</strong>ly charging up<strong>on</strong> Adam s sin<br />

<strong>the</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> this Increase <strong>of</strong><br />

punishment.<br />

punishment<br />

is fresh punishment. Taylor<br />

thus oscillates between<br />

Adam s<br />

acknowledging and disowning punishment for<br />

sin. He disowns it as inc<strong>on</strong>sistent with justice ; he<br />

acknowledges it because he cannot wholly deny that some<br />

thing very like it is maintained in Scripture, and he<br />

shrinks from wholly giving up <strong>the</strong> received doctrine. He

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!