22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

308 C<strong>on</strong>chtsi<strong>on</strong>. CHAP. xi.<br />

<strong>on</strong>e-sided <strong>the</strong>ories are a stumbling block to ordinary minds,<br />

tending to c<strong>on</strong>fuse <strong>the</strong>ir reas<strong>on</strong> and moral percepti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Still, regarding <strong>the</strong> error <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> predestinarian apart from<br />

those c<strong>on</strong>sequences which it tends practically to produce<br />

in <strong>the</strong> minds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vulgar, but which are not legitimately<br />

deducible from it, it cannot perhaps be called much more<br />

than a metaphysical mistake, an overlooking <strong>of</strong> a truth<br />

in human nature ; a truth indistinctly perceived indeed,<br />

but still perceived in that sense and mode in which many<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r recognised truths are perceived. The predestinarian<br />

passes over <strong>the</strong> incomplete percepti<strong>on</strong> we have <strong>of</strong> our ori<br />

ginality as agents, because his mind is preoccupied with a<br />

rival truth. But this cannot in itself be called an <strong>of</strong>fence<br />

a well-intended<br />

against piety : ra<strong>the</strong>r it is occasi<strong>on</strong>ed by<br />

though excessive regard to a great maxim <strong>of</strong> piety. He is<br />

unreas<strong>on</strong>ably jealous for <strong>the</strong> Divine Attribute, and afraid<br />

that any original power assigned to man will endanger <strong>the</strong><br />

Divine. He thus allows <strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong> man no original part<br />

in good acti<strong>on</strong>, but throws all goodness back up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Deity, as <strong>the</strong> sole Source and Creator <strong>of</strong> it, forming and<br />

fashi<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> human soul as <strong>the</strong> potter moulds <strong>the</strong> clay.<br />

It may be said, indeed, that his doctrine, in attributing<br />

injustice to <strong>the</strong> Deity, is inc<strong>on</strong>sistent with piety<br />

: but he<br />

does not attribute injustice to <strong>the</strong> Deity; but <strong>on</strong>ly a<br />

mode <strong>of</strong> acting, which, as c<strong>on</strong>ceived and understood by<br />

us, is unjust ; or which we cannot explain in c<strong>on</strong>sistency<br />

with justice.<br />

II. Pelagianism, <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>of</strong>fends against <strong>the</strong><br />

first principles <strong>of</strong> piety, and opposes <strong>the</strong> great religious<br />

instincts and ideas <strong>of</strong> mankind. It first tampers with <strong>the</strong><br />

sense <strong>of</strong> sin. The sense <strong>of</strong> sin as actually entertained by<br />

<strong>the</strong> human mind that sense <strong>of</strong> it which we ;<br />

perceive, ob<br />

serve, and are c<strong>on</strong>scious <strong>of</strong>, as a great religious fact a part<br />

<strong>of</strong> our moral nature whenever sufficiently enlightened is<br />

not a simple, but a mysterious and a complex sense ; not<br />

c<strong>on</strong>fined to positive acti<strong>on</strong>, as <strong>the</strong> occasi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> it, but going<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r back and attaching itself to desire ; nor attaching<br />

itself to desire <strong>on</strong>ly as <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> free choice, but to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!