22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

358<br />

Note VIII.<br />

Esau. Vol. ix. p. 436. There is c<strong>on</strong>siderable c<strong>on</strong>fusi<strong>on</strong><br />

here, and Origen seems to slide from works not carnal to<br />

no works at all as <strong>the</strong> ground <strong>of</strong> electi<strong>on</strong> ; though <strong>the</strong><br />

former idea in <strong>the</strong> main prevails. Origen s main view <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> ground <strong>of</strong> electi<strong>on</strong> is foreseen good character. Vol. iv.<br />

p. 616.<br />

Jacks<strong>on</strong> explains <strong>the</strong> similitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potter and <strong>the</strong><br />

clay <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> same principle<br />

first making was <strong>the</strong> fault <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clay. Vol. ix. p. 462.<br />

But is this said in Scripture ? On <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trary, it is said<br />

that all <strong>the</strong> clay was <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same lump, and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong><br />

: That it was marred in <strong>the</strong><br />

difference <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Divine design did not arise from any dif<br />

ference in <strong>the</strong> clay. Origen makes in <strong>the</strong> same way a<br />

difference in <strong>the</strong> clay, though <strong>the</strong> very phrase eadem<br />

massa, which he accepts, as he is obliged to do, from <strong>the</strong><br />

Apostle, refutes it. Videns Deus puritatern ejus, et<br />

potestatem<br />

habens ex eadem massa facere aliud vas ad<br />

h<strong>on</strong>orem aliud ad c<strong>on</strong>tumeliam, Jacob quidem qui emundaverat<br />

seipsum fecit vas ad h<strong>on</strong>orem ; Esau vero eujus<br />

animam n<strong>on</strong> ita puram nee ita simplicein videbat, ex<br />

eadem massa fecit ad c<strong>on</strong>tumeliam. In Rom. ix. vol.<br />

iv. p. 616.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> explanati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> foreseen goodness, however, as<br />

<strong>the</strong> ground <strong>of</strong> electi<strong>on</strong>, Jacks<strong>on</strong> couples <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r mode <strong>of</strong><br />

rec<strong>on</strong>ciling <strong>the</strong> passage with freewill ; viz. that <strong>of</strong> electi<strong>on</strong><br />

to means and opportunities. The Apostle imagineth<br />

such a potter as <strong>the</strong> wise man did, that knows a reas<strong>on</strong><br />

why he makes <strong>on</strong>e vessel <strong>of</strong> this fashi<strong>on</strong>, ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> that,<br />

why he appoints this to a base use, that to a better. 1<br />

P. 462.<br />

Hooker s explanati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passage (given in a recently<br />

discovered and edited writing, made an appendix to Ec<br />

clesiastical Polity, bk. v.) makes, like Origen s and Jack<br />

s<strong>on</strong> s, a difference in <strong>the</strong> clay, though he will not at <strong>the</strong><br />

same time allow that <strong>the</strong> Divine Justice requires this<br />

reas<strong>on</strong> for its own defence. Suppose (which is yet false)<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re were nothing in it, but <strong>on</strong>ly so Grod will have<br />

it, suppose Grod did harden and s<strong>of</strong>ten, choose and cast<br />

<strong>of</strong>f, make h<strong>on</strong>ourable and detestable, whom Himself will,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!