22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Note XIII. 373<br />

<strong>the</strong> better c<strong>on</strong>struer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Greek words, which our trans<br />

lati<strong>on</strong> with him renders into for that, and not with<br />

S. Augustine into in whom. l But though this particular<br />

clause, thus translated, refers to a ground <strong>of</strong> actual sin,<br />

not <strong>of</strong> original, or sin in Adam, as S. Augustine under<br />

stood it; <strong>the</strong> reference to actual sin does not destroy tlie<br />

previous reference to original, at <strong>the</strong> beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> th-<br />

verse. The previous asserti<strong>on</strong> is plain and decisive, that<br />

by <strong>on</strong>e man sin entered into <strong>the</strong> world; though tlmystery<br />

<strong>of</strong> original sin must still be held toge<strong>the</strong>r witli<br />

<strong>the</strong> truth <strong>of</strong> nature that (rod <strong>on</strong>ly punishes men for that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y <strong>the</strong>mselves have sinned.<br />

It was equally vain in a comment <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> text that<br />

<strong>the</strong> judgment was from <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong>fence to c<strong>on</strong>demnati<strong>on</strong>, but<br />

<strong>the</strong> free gift was <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong>fences unto to<br />

justificati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

attempt to negative <strong>the</strong> unity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sin menti<strong>on</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong><br />

preceding clause by <strong>the</strong> plurality in <strong>the</strong> next and to ; argue,<br />

that if <strong>on</strong>e sin had been <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> general<br />

sinful-<br />

ness <strong>of</strong> mankind,<br />

it would have been written from o,&amp;gt;e<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence, not from many <strong>of</strong>fences unto justificati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The unity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source is not inc<strong>on</strong>sistent with pluralii y<br />

in <strong>the</strong> proceeds from it. To interpret many again to<br />

mean many <strong>of</strong>fences <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e and <strong>the</strong> same pers<strong>on</strong> was gra<br />

tuitous, 3<br />

though c<strong>on</strong>venient for a coveted inference, that<br />

<strong>the</strong> state out <strong>of</strong> which a man was raised at justificati<strong>on</strong><br />

was c<strong>on</strong>templated here <strong>on</strong>ly as a state <strong>of</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>al, not<br />

<strong>of</strong> original sin.<br />

No candid interpreter, again, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text, As t by<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e judgment came all up<strong>on</strong> men to c<strong>on</strong>demna<br />

ti<strong>on</strong> even so ; by <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong> One <strong>the</strong> free jni<br />

righteousness<br />

came up<strong>on</strong> all men unto justificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> life, would allow<br />

<strong>the</strong> remark that, as ;<br />

its obvious force to be negatived by<br />

mankind do not attain to <strong>the</strong><br />

justificati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

universality<br />

ascribed to <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> Adam s sin in <strong>the</strong> first clause<br />

destroyed by <strong>the</strong> necessarily limited sense <strong>of</strong> universality<br />

as applied to in <strong>the</strong> next.<br />

justificati<strong>on</strong>, 4 \\ here <strong>the</strong> weigh<br />

Op. Imp. 1. 2. c. 63. Adam quoque<br />

universis nocuUso<br />

1. 2. c. 1<br />

2 Ibid c 105 fingatur. Op. Imp.<br />

3 t^ parvulos multis obnoxios Augustine answers, Qui pp^ten-a<br />

esse criminibus. -Ibid. c. 114. omnes dictus eat etia<br />

liberate,<br />

Si Christus salvarit universes, qu<strong>on</strong>iam n<strong>on</strong> hberat quenquam HIM<br />

-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!