22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Note VIII.<br />

357<br />

hath any, would quickly cut <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong>ir progress with a dis<br />

tincti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> visibile ut quod, et visibile ut quo, and show<br />

that <strong>the</strong> major, though universally true <strong>of</strong> every subject or<br />

body that may be seen, did not nor could not comprehend<br />

colour by which <strong>the</strong>y are made visible, and by whose<br />

formal act <strong>the</strong>y are denominated colorata. The fallacy <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> former objecti<strong>on</strong> drawn into mood and figure is <strong>the</strong><br />

same, but more apparent.<br />

Every will or work <strong>of</strong> man must be utterly renounced<br />

from <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> justificati<strong>on</strong> or c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> :<br />

But to deny ourselves and renounce all works is a work :<br />

Ergo,<br />

This work must be excluded from <strong>the</strong> suit <strong>of</strong><br />

mercy, as no way available. Vol. ix. p. 442.<br />

ground<br />

But such a distincti<strong>on</strong> as this applied to works as a<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Divine electi<strong>on</strong> is inadmissible. The work <strong>of</strong><br />

faith is a work ; not in such an ambiguous sense as that in<br />

which colour is a visible thing, but substantially and cor<br />

rectly. It is a humble, self-renouncing act. It is <strong>the</strong><br />

fundamental act <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Christian life. If electi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong>n, is<br />

in c<strong>on</strong>sequence <strong>of</strong> this foreseen work <strong>of</strong> faith, it is in c<strong>on</strong><br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> good works, which it is plainly said by S. Paul<br />

not to be.<br />

Jacks<strong>on</strong> borrows his explanati<strong>on</strong> from Origen, who im<br />

plies <strong>the</strong> same distincti<strong>on</strong> between carnal works and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r works, as <strong>the</strong> ground <strong>of</strong> Jacob s electi<strong>on</strong>. Quod si<br />

vel Isaac vel Jacob pro his meritis electi fuissent a Deo<br />

quce in came positi acquisierant, et per opera carnis<br />

justificari meruissent, posset utique meriti eorum gratia ad<br />

posteritatem carnis Nunc vero cum<br />

quoque pertinere.<br />

electio eorum n<strong>on</strong> ex operibus<br />

facta sit, sed ex proposito<br />

Dei, et ex vocantis arbitrio, promissi<strong>on</strong>um gratia n<strong>on</strong> in<br />

filiis carnis impletur,<br />

sed in filiis Dei. In Rom. ix. 11.<br />

vol. iv. p. 613. Thus Jacks<strong>on</strong> : Had not this purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

God been revealed before <strong>the</strong> children had been born,<br />

Jacob s posterity would have boasted that ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ir fa<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Jacob or his mo<strong>the</strong>r Eebecca had better observed those<br />

rites and customs wherein <strong>the</strong>y placed righteousness than<br />

Isaac or Esau had d<strong>on</strong>e and that God ; up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>se motives<br />

Jacob before<br />

had bestowed <strong>the</strong> birthright or blessing up<strong>on</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!