22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAP. vnr. <strong>of</strong> Freewill. 2 1 r<br />

ciently proved by Scripture saying, will not this, and will<br />

not that, and demanding an act <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> will in doing or not<br />

doing anything. Let no <strong>on</strong>e <strong>the</strong>n blame God in his heart,<br />

but impute it to himself when he sins. Nor, when he does<br />

anything according to Grod s will, let him alienate it from<br />

his own. For when he does it<br />

willingly, <strong>the</strong>n it is a good<br />

work, <strong>the</strong>n a reward attaches to it quando volens facit<br />

tune dicendum est opus b<strong>on</strong>um.&quot; 1<br />

Again <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> text<br />

All men cannot receive this saying, save <strong>the</strong>y to whom it<br />

is given ; he says, Those to whom it is not given ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

will not or do not what <strong>the</strong>y will : those to whom it is<br />

given so will that <strong>the</strong>y do what <strong>the</strong>y will. That which is<br />

not received by all, but is received by some, is both <strong>the</strong><br />

gift <strong>of</strong> Grod and also is freewill et &quot;Dei d<strong>on</strong>um eat, et<br />

liberum arbitrium. That is to say, it is freewill in him,<br />

because, from whatever source it comes, when he has it, it<br />

is his own will. These explanati<strong>on</strong>s all appeal to <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>of</strong><br />

a will in man, as being sufficient to c<strong>on</strong>stitute a free agent,<br />

and a proper subject <strong>of</strong> promises or threats, <strong>of</strong> reward or<br />

punishment. Indeed, what <strong>the</strong>se arguments are designed<br />

to remove is not any part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> predestinarian doctrine,<br />

but <strong>on</strong>ly a false practical inference from it ; for <strong>the</strong> occa<br />

si<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> which this treatise was written was, that certain<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>s had begun to argue, that if that doctrine was true,<br />

it did not signify what kind <strong>of</strong> lives men led, because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were not resp<strong>on</strong>sible for <strong>the</strong>m. Augustine<br />

corrects this<br />

inference by reminding <strong>the</strong>m, that <strong>the</strong> predestinarian doc<br />

trine did not exclude a will in man ; and that if he had a<br />

will, that made him resp<strong>on</strong>sible.<br />

Augustine s doctrine <strong>of</strong> freewill, <strong>the</strong>n, does not come<br />

up to that which is ordinarily understood as that doctrine ;<br />

not advancing bey<strong>on</strong>d that point up to which <strong>the</strong> doctrine<br />

<strong>of</strong> freewill and <strong>the</strong> opposite doctrine agree. He acknow<br />

ledges a will in man, that which makes him act willingly,<br />

as distinguished from acting by compulsi<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong><br />

straint ; but this is saying nothing as to how that will is<br />

determined.<br />

II. But, in <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d place, we come to <strong>the</strong> questi<strong>on</strong><br />

p 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!