22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 2 The Pelagian C<strong>on</strong>troversy. CHAP. nr.<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> virtue and vice, succeeded <strong>the</strong> questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Divine justice.<br />

The doctrine <strong>of</strong> original<br />

sin described all mankind as<br />

punished for <strong>the</strong> sin <strong>of</strong> Adam, deriving a positive sinfulness,<br />

and even a necessity to sin, a slavery, and a captivity<br />

from it. But how was it c<strong>on</strong>sistent with justice that <strong>on</strong>e<br />

that man<br />

man should be punished for <strong>the</strong> sin <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r ;<br />

kind should be created guilty, and derive from <strong>on</strong>e par<br />

ticular act committed before <strong>the</strong>y were born a positive<br />

necessity to sin ? 1 The objecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pelagian was met<br />

in two ways ; first, by an appeal to mystery ; and, sec<strong>on</strong>dly,<br />

by an appeal to facts.<br />

1. The objecti<strong>on</strong><br />

that it was c<strong>on</strong>trary to <strong>the</strong> Divine<br />

justice to punish <strong>on</strong>e man for <strong>the</strong> sin <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r was met<br />

by an appeal to mystery, and <strong>the</strong> answer that <strong>the</strong> Divine<br />

justice was incomprehensible. And this was a sound and<br />

was not<br />

proper answer, but <strong>the</strong> form in which it was put<br />

wholly faultless.<br />

For it is <strong>on</strong>e thing to say that <strong>the</strong> Divine justice is<br />

incomprehensible, and ano<strong>the</strong>r thing to say that <strong>the</strong> Divine<br />

or that we are to<br />

justice is different from human justice ;<br />

have a different idea altoge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> justice as a human and<br />

as a Divine characteristic. In saying that <strong>the</strong> Divine<br />

justice is incomprehensible we make no asserti<strong>on</strong> about it<br />

at all, and <strong>the</strong>refore do not establish any c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong><br />

between it and our natural ideas <strong>of</strong> justice. Having c<strong>on</strong><br />

ceived <strong>of</strong> it, so far as we c<strong>on</strong>ceived <strong>of</strong> it at all, as <strong>the</strong><br />

ordinary natural quality so called, we <strong>on</strong>ly cease at a<br />

certain point to form any c<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong> about it. But to<br />

say that <strong>the</strong> Divine justice is different from human is to<br />

c<strong>on</strong>fuse our moral noti<strong>on</strong>s altoge<strong>the</strong>r. Pressed by <strong>the</strong><br />

Pelagian with <strong>the</strong> str<strong>on</strong>g testim<strong>on</strong>ies in Scripture to <strong>the</strong><br />

rule <strong>of</strong> natural justice, that no man should be punished except<br />

1 Ais credere te quidem c<strong>on</strong>di- nuum suarum Deus; et quod pertorem<br />

Deutn,sed malorum hominum suasit diabolus teuuiter. solerter et<br />

. . . . et Dei sanctitati informa- perseveranter fingit et protegit et<br />

ti<strong>on</strong>em sceleris<br />

appulisti. Great format Deus. Et fructum ab horaine<br />

igitur malam Deus et puniuntur b<strong>on</strong>itatis reposcit, cui malum in-<br />

iniipcerites propter quod fecit Deus ; genuit Deus. Julian, ap. Op. Imp.<br />

et imputat hominibus crinien ma- 1. 3. c. 124. et sea.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!