22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 8 Examinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CHAP, n.<br />

<strong>the</strong> fact <strong>of</strong>, <strong>the</strong> human will ; that we act willingly and not<br />

like inanimate machines ; nor does <strong>the</strong> necessitarian deny,<br />

that <strong>the</strong> human will is will, and as far as sensati<strong>on</strong> goes<br />

free, though he represents it as ultimately moved from<br />

without. Here, <strong>the</strong>n, is a sort <strong>of</strong> freewill which is c<strong>on</strong>sistent<br />

with <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Divine Power. But this, as was above<br />

is<br />

explained,<br />

not such a freewill as meets <strong>the</strong> demands <strong>of</strong><br />

natural c<strong>on</strong>sciousness, which is satisfied with nothing short<br />

<strong>of</strong> a characteristic <strong>of</strong> will, which comes into collisi<strong>on</strong> with<br />

our idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Divine Power viz., originality.<br />

Again, <strong>the</strong> objecti<strong>on</strong> against <strong>the</strong> doctrine <strong>of</strong> freewill,<br />

that it would remove human acti<strong>on</strong>s from <strong>the</strong> Divine Pro<br />

vidence, 1 and so reduce this whole moral scheme <strong>of</strong> things<br />

to chance, has an immediate answer in <strong>the</strong> very nature <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> truth as here described. Undoubtedly <strong>the</strong>re is a c<strong>on</strong><br />

tradicti<strong>on</strong> in supposing that events really c<strong>on</strong>tingent can<br />

be foreseen, made <strong>the</strong> subjects <strong>of</strong> previous arrangement,<br />

and come into a scheme <strong>of</strong> Providence and ; though this<br />

is sometimes met by <strong>the</strong> answer that <strong>the</strong> Divine foresight<br />

is <strong>the</strong> sight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> events as such, and not in <strong>the</strong>ir causes<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly, and that <strong>the</strong>refore c<strong>on</strong>tingent events can be foreseen<br />

by God as being events, which however future to us, are<br />

present to His eternal eye<br />

foresight<br />

; it must be owned that such a<br />

as this is a c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong> to our reas<strong>on</strong>2<br />

,<br />

and that<br />

1<br />

If <strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong> man be free with no use to direct and regulate perfect<br />

a liberty ad utrumlibet, and if his accident. Edwards On Freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

acti<strong>on</strong>s be <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> his will, <strong>the</strong> Will, part 3, sect. 4.<br />

such <strong>of</strong> his 2 acti<strong>on</strong>s which are not yet That no future event can be<br />

wrought, must be both radically and certainly foreknown whose existence<br />

eventually uncertain. It is <strong>the</strong>refore is c<strong>on</strong>tingent and without all necesa<br />

chance whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are performed sity, may be proved thus : it is imor<br />

no. ... So that any assertor <strong>of</strong> possible for a thing to be certainly<br />

self-determinati<strong>on</strong> is in fact, whe<strong>the</strong>r known to any intellect without evihe<br />

mean it or no, a worshipper <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dence . . . But no understanding,<br />

hea<strong>the</strong>n lady named Fortune, and an created or uncreated, can see eviideal<br />

deposer <strong>of</strong> Providence from its dence where <strong>the</strong>re is n<strong>on</strong>e . . . But<br />

thr<strong>on</strong>e. Toplady, vol. vi. p. 90. if <strong>the</strong>re be a future event whose<br />

If it be said that voliti<strong>on</strong>s are existence is c<strong>on</strong>tingent without all<br />

events that come to pass without necessity, <strong>the</strong> future existence <strong>of</strong><br />

any determining cause, that is most <strong>the</strong> event is<br />

absolutely without evipalpably<br />

inc<strong>on</strong>sistent with all use <strong>of</strong> dence. Edwards, On Freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

laws and precepts; for nothing is Will, part 2, sect. 12.<br />

more plain than that laws can be <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!