22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 Scholastic <strong>Doctrine</strong> CHAP. x.<br />

such an inference from his use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term c<strong>on</strong>tingent.<br />

Aquinas divides proximate or mediate or sec<strong>on</strong>dary causes<br />

into two classes, necessary and c<strong>on</strong>tingent ; but <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong><br />

tingent causes are still mediate causes <strong>on</strong>ly, not original<br />

<strong>on</strong>es. They are as in complete subordinati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> first<br />

cause, as necessary causes are ; <strong>on</strong>ly differing<br />

from <strong>the</strong><br />

latter in <strong>the</strong>ir manner <strong>of</strong> operati<strong>on</strong>, which is variable and<br />

irregular, instead <strong>of</strong> fixed and uniform. And <strong>the</strong> human<br />

will, as a c<strong>on</strong>tingent cause, is no more than a mediate <strong>on</strong>e.<br />

(rod is cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> will ipse actus liberi arbitrii reducitur<br />

in Deum sicut in causam. C<strong>on</strong>tingency <strong>the</strong>n in<br />

acts is not, according to <strong>the</strong> doctrine <strong>of</strong> Aquinas, opposed<br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir ultimate causati<strong>on</strong> from without ; which is <strong>the</strong><br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> necessity : c<strong>on</strong>tingency is a certain mode in<br />

which things take place ; and voliti<strong>on</strong> is such a mode in<br />

<strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> acti<strong>on</strong>s ; but voliti<strong>on</strong> is a mode, and not <strong>the</strong><br />

cause, in <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> original cause, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

There is ano<strong>the</strong>r set <strong>of</strong> expressi<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Augustinian</strong><br />

schoolmen relating to human blame and resp<strong>on</strong>sibility, to<br />

which Archbishop Laurence refers. To <strong>the</strong> inquiry why<br />

some are unendowed with grace, <strong>the</strong>ir answer was, because<br />

some are not willing to receive it, and not because (rod is<br />

unwilling to give it ; He, <strong>the</strong>y said, <strong>of</strong>fers His light to all :<br />

He is absent from n<strong>on</strong>e, but man absents himself from <strong>the</strong><br />

present Deity, like <strong>on</strong>e who shuts his eyes against <strong>the</strong> no<strong>on</strong><br />

day blaze. J The language he refers to is that <strong>of</strong> Aquinas,<br />

whom again he quotes as saying that <strong>the</strong>re are two reas<strong>on</strong>s<br />

why grace, where it is withheld, is withheld ; <strong>on</strong>e because<br />

<strong>the</strong> man is not willing to receive it, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r because Grod<br />

does not will to give it ;<br />

<strong>of</strong> which two <strong>the</strong> latter is posterior<br />

in order to <strong>the</strong> former talis est ordo ut secundum n<strong>on</strong><br />

sit nisi ex suppositi<strong>on</strong>e primi.* Understanding <strong>the</strong> want<br />

<strong>of</strong> desire for grace, referred to here, to be <strong>the</strong> oppositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> individual s free and self-determining will, he takes<br />

<strong>the</strong>se expressi<strong>on</strong>s as involving <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> doctrine <strong>of</strong><br />

freewill, that Grod <strong>of</strong>fers His grace to all, while man rejects<br />

or accepts it according to his own choice. But <strong>the</strong> fault<br />

1<br />

Bampt<strong>on</strong> Lectures, p. 151.<br />

3<br />

Aquinas inLomb. 1. 1. Dist. 40. Q. 4. A. 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!