22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Note V.<br />

333<br />

any rati<strong>on</strong>ale which stopped short <strong>of</strong> this ? You might<br />

explain to him that his will being caused from without<br />

did not imply any force or coacti<strong>on</strong>, but that he might<br />

have all <strong>the</strong> sensati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> voluntary agency while lie was<br />

still really acting from causes ultimately bey<strong>on</strong>d his own<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trol ; but such an explanati<strong>on</strong> would not satisfy him.<br />

The feeling he has that he can decide ei<strong>the</strong>r way in <strong>the</strong><br />

case <strong>of</strong> any proposed acti<strong>on</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> regret or pleasure<br />

that he feels afterwards, according to <strong>the</strong> use which he has<br />

made <strong>of</strong> this apparent power, will make him think himself<br />

an original agent, and he will be dissatisfied with any<br />

rati<strong>on</strong>ale <strong>of</strong> his acti<strong>on</strong> which stops short <strong>of</strong> this.<br />

Mr. Mill is indeed sufficiently aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> this natural c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> originality in <strong>the</strong> human<br />

mind, to be induced to meet and satisfy<br />

its demands as<br />

far as he can in c<strong>on</strong>sistency with his <strong>the</strong>ory ; but he can<br />

not, because his <strong>the</strong>ory prevents him, really satisfy <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

He admits, however, for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> satisfying this<br />

claim, that a man can in a certain sense form his own<br />

character, and is an agent acting up<strong>on</strong> himself, and he<br />

draws a distincti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> this head between <strong>the</strong> necessarian<br />

and <strong>the</strong> fatalist ; <strong>the</strong> former <strong>of</strong> whom, according to him,<br />

allows, in keeping with true philosophy, this agency up<strong>on</strong><br />

self, while <strong>the</strong> latter, carried away by <strong>the</strong> fallacy that <strong>the</strong><br />

certainty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> end supersedes <strong>the</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> means<br />

&quot;<br />

or subordinate agencies,<br />

denies it. A fatalist believes,<br />

or half believes (for nobody is a c<strong>on</strong>sistent fatalist), not<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly that whatever is about to happen will be an infallible<br />

result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> causes which produce it is<br />

(which<br />

<strong>the</strong> true<br />

necessarian doctrine), but, moreover, that <strong>the</strong>re is no use<br />

struggling against it; that it will happen however we<br />

may strive to prevent it. Now, a necessarian believing<br />

that our acti<strong>on</strong>s follow from our characters, and that our<br />

characters follow from our our<br />

organisati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

educati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

and our circumstances, is apt to be, with more or less <strong>of</strong><br />

c<strong>on</strong>sciousness <strong>on</strong> his part,<br />

a fatalist as to his acti<strong>on</strong>s, and<br />

to believe that his nature is such, or that his educati<strong>on</strong><br />

and circumstances have so moulded his character, that<br />

nothing can now prevent him from feeling and acting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!