Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

More documents

Recommendations

Info

400 Note XXL schools which was orthodox, though it was overlaid with weak or injurious commentary. In the next place he makes a distinction amongst schoolmen; and while he complains of the refinements of Lombard and Aquinas, regards them as in the main orthodox : Longiore intervallo a recentioribus sophistis differed Inst. 1. 2. c. 2. s. 6. The older commentators he considers to have main tained, though with too little boldness and openness, and with too great an appearance of compromise, the Augustinian ground. Thus he complains of Lombard s use of the term freewill : Ac principal em quidem causam in gratia esse non negant cludi liberum arbitrium, per quod sit omne meritum. Neque id tradunt posteriores modo sophistse, sed eorum : sed eo tamen contendunt non ex- Pythagoras Lombardus ; quern, si cum istis compares, sanum et sobrium esse dicas. Mirse profecto csecitatis fait, quum Augustinum toties in ore haberet, non vidisse quanta solicitudine vir ille caverit ne ulla ex bonis operibus glorise particula in hominem derivaretur. Instit. 1. 3. c. 15. s. 7. Magister sententiarum duplicem gratiam necessariam esse nobis docet, quo reddamur ad opus bonum idonei. Alteram vocat Operantem, qua fit ut efficaciter velimus bonum ; Cooperantem alteram quse bonam voluntatem sequitur adjuvando. In qua parti tione hoc mini displicet, quod dum Gratias Dei tribuit efficacem boni appetitum, innuit hominem jam suapte natura bonum quodammodo licet inefficaciter appetere. ... In secundo membro ambiguitas me offendit, quse perversam genuit interpretationem. Ideo enim putarunt nos secundse Dei gratise cooperari, quod nostri juris sit primam gratiain vel respuendo irritam facere, v*l obedienter sequendo confirmare. . . . Hcec duo notare obiter libuit, ut videas jam lector, quantum a sanioribus scholasticis dissen- tiam. . . . Utcunque, ex hac tamen parti tione intelligimus qua ratione liberum dederint arbitrium homini. Pro- nuntiat enim tandem Lombardus, non liberi arbitrii ideo nos esse, quod ad bonum vel ad malum vel agendum vel cogitandum perceque polleamus, sed duntaxat quod coactione soluti sumus. . . . Optime id quidem, sed
Note XXL 4 oi quorsum attinebat, rem tantulam adeo superbo titulo in- signire Equidem Xoyofjua^ias abominor, quibus frustra ecclesia fatigatur; sed religiose censeo cavendas eas voces quse absurdum aliquid sonant, proesertim ubi perniciose erratur. Quotus enim quaeso qnisque est, qui, dum assignari homini liberum arbitrium audit, non statim concipit ilium esse et mentis sure et voluntatis dominum, qui flectere se in utramvis partem a seipso possit? Atqui (dicet quispiam) sublatum erit hujusmodi perictilum, si de significatione diligenter plebs admoneatur. Imo vero cum in falsitatem ultro humanum ingenium propendeat, citius errorem ex verbulo uno hauriet, quam veritatem ex prolixa oratione. Instit. 1. 2. c. 2. ss. 6, 7. It is evident that Calvin s quarrel with Lombard here is about the use of a word, and not about a substantial point of doctrine. In substantial doctrine he considers they both agree, though he thinks Lombard s distinction of operative and co-operative grace so worded as to tend to mislead, and though he objects to the use of the word freewill altogether, which he thinks will always lie practi cally understood by the mass of men in the sense of a selfdetermining will. He would not object to the word if Lombard s sense could be fastened upon it but he differs ; from him as to the expediency of using a term on which it and which will will be so difficult to fasten this meaning, always more readily suggest another and an erroneous one. His disagreement with Lombard is thus of the same kind with the disagreement noticed above, p. 267, with Aquinas, which was concerned with language and mode of statement as distinguished from substantial doctrine. Calvin s reflections on the schoolmen, then, do not appear to prove any substantial difference on the subject of predestination, grace, and freewill, between himself and the Augustinian portion of the schoolmen. And this con clusion obliges me to notice some remarks of Pascal bearing on this question in the Provincial Letters. I must admit, then, that I have against me, on this point, the authority of Pascal, who endeavours in the Pro vincial Letters to prove a strong distinction between the DD
Page 2:
FRQM THE LIBT^R^ OF TRINITY COLLEGE
Page 6 and 7:
&T / c ML 1 1 7 1 OCT 1 91984 LON D
Page 9 and 10:
SUMMAEY OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. STA
Page 11 and 12:
Summary of Contents. [9] CHAPTER IV
Page 13 and 14:
Summary of Contents. [ 1 1 ] CHAPTE
Page 15 and 16:
INDEX OF PEOPEE NAMES. ALVAREZ ALVA
Page 17 and 18:
THE AUGUSTINIAN DOCTRINE OF PREDEST
Page 19 and 20:
CFAP. i. For Predestination. God th
Page 21 and 22:
CHAP. i. For Predestination. 5 is t
Page 23 and 24:
CHAP. T. For Predestination. 7 ment
Page 25 and 26:
CHAP. i. For Predestination. 9 scho
Page 27 and 28:
CHAP. T. For Predestination. 1 1 de
Page 29 and 30:
CHAP. i. For Predestination. 1 3 Ha
Page 31 and 32:
CHAP. i. For Predestination. 15 apt
Page 33 and 34:
CHAP. ii. Argument for Predestinati
Page 35 and 36:
CHAP. n. Argument for Predestinatio
Page 37 and 38:
CHAP. it. Argumentfor Predestinatio
Page 39 and 40:
CHAP. ir. Argument for Predestinati
Page 41 and 42:
CHAP. IT. Argument for Predestinati
Page 43 and 44:
CHAP. IT. Argument for Predestinati
Page 45 and 46:
CHAP. ir. Argument for Predestinati
Page 47 and 48:
CFAP. ii. Argument for Predestinati
Page 49 and 50:
CHAP. IT. Argumentfor Predestinatio
Page 51 and 52:
CHAP. n. Argument for Predestinatio
Page 53 and 54:
CHAP. ir. Argumentfor Predestinatio
Page 55 and 56:
CHAP. ii. Argument for Predestinati
Page 57 and 58:
CHAP. ir. Argumentfor Predestinatio
Page 59 and 60:
CHAI>. ii. Argument for Pred
Page 61 and 62:
CHAP. ii. Argumentfor Predestinatio
Page 63 and 64:
CHAP. nr. The Pelagian Controversy.
Page 65 and 66:
CHAP. in. The Pelagian Controversy.
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
CHAP. ITT. The Pelagian Controversy
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
CHAP. HI. The Pelagian Controversy.
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
CHAP. TIL The Pelagian Controversy.
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
CHAP. ni. The Pelagian Controversy.
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
CHAP. nr. The Pelagian Controversy.
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
CTTAP. in. The Pelagian Controversy
Page 117 and 118:
CHAP. iv. of Original Sin. 101 invo
Page 119 and 120:
CHAP. iv. of Original Sin. 103 as a
Page 121 and 122:
CHAP. iv. of Original Sin. 1 05 A w
Page 123 and 124:
CHAP. iv. of Original Sin. 107 was
Page 125 and 126:
CHAP. IV. of Original Sin. 109 trut
Page 127 and 128:
CHAP. iv. of Original Sin. 1 1 1 Th
Page 129 and 130:
CHA.P. rv. of Original Sin. 113 of
Page 131 and 132:
CHAP. iv. of Original Sin. 1 1 5 in
Page 133 and 134:
CHAP. iv. of (Original Sin. 1 1 7 v
Page 135 and 136:
CHAP. rr. of Original Sin. 1 1 9 po
Page 137 and 138:
CHAP. iv. of Original Sin. 1 2 1 So
Page 139 and 140:
CHAP. iv. of Original Sin. 123 assi
Page 141 and 142:
CHAP. iv. of Original Sin. 125 cert
Page 143 and 144:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 127 Who
Page 145 and 146:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 129 The
Page 147 and 148:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 137 cal
Page 149 and 150:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 133 est
Page 151 and 152:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 135 giv
Page 153 and 154:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 137 bee
Page 155 and 156:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 139 the
Page 157 and 158:
CJTAP. v. of Predestination. 141 re
Page 159 and 160:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 143 sin
Page 161 and 162:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 145 lar
Page 163 and 164:
CHAP. v. of Predestination. 147 S.
Page 165 and 166:
CHAP. vi. Doctrine of Grace. \ 49 i
Page 167 and 168:
CHAP. vr. Doctrine of Grace. 151 Pa
Page 169 and 170:
CHAP. vr. Doctrine of Grace. 153 on
Page 171 and 172:
CHAP. YI. Doctrine of Grace. 155 th
Page 173 and 174:
CHAP. vr. Doctrine of Grace. 157 be
Page 175 and 176:
CHAP. YJ. Doctrine of Grace. 159 ev
Page 177 and 178:
CHAP. vi. Doctrine of Grace. 1 6 1
Page 179 and 180:
CHAP. vi. Doctrine of Grace. 163 In
Page 181 and 182:
CHAP. vi. Doctrine of Grace. 165 co
Page 183 and 184:
CHAP. vr. Doctrine of Grace. 167 su
Page 185 and 186:
- ... t 4 rtne of\ CHAP. vi. Doctri
Page 187 and 188:
**rine , of CHAP. TI. Doctrine^of G
Page 189 and 190:
CHAP. vi. Doctrine of Grace. 1 73 G
Page 191 and 192:
CHAP. vi. Doctrine of Grace. 175 it
Page 193 and 194:
CHAP. vr. Doctrine of Grace. 177 of
Page 195 and 196:
vii. Doctrine of Final Perseverance
Page 197 and 198:
CHAP. VIT. of Final Perseverance. 1
Page 199 and 200:
CHAP. vii. of Final Perseverance. 1
Page 201 and 202:
CHAP. vir. of Final Perseverance. 1
Page 203 and 204:
CHAP. VIT. of Final Perseverance. 1
Page 205 and 206:
CHAP. vii. of Final Perseverance. g
Page 207 and 208:
CHA.P. vii. of Final Perseverance.
Page 209 and 210:
CHAP. vii. of Final Perseverance. 1
Page 211 and 212:
CFAP. vii. of Final Perseverance. 1
Page 213 and 214:
CHAP. -mi. of Freewill. 197 holds i
Page 215 and 216:
CHAP. V1IJ. of Freewill. 199 But th
Page 217 and 218:
CHAP. Till. of Freewill. 201 some s
Page 219 and 220:
CHAP. viii. of Freewill. 203 otherw
Page 221 and 222:
CHAP. Till. of Freewill. 205 The wr
Page 223 and 224:
CHAP. viii. of Freewill. 207 that i
Page 225 and 226:
CHAP. vin. of Freewill. 209 wrangii
Page 227 and 228:
CHAP. vnr. of Freewill. 2 1 r cient
Page 229 and 230:
CHAP. VHI. of Freewill. 2 1 3 give
Page 231 and 232:
CHAP. Till. of Freewill. 2 1 5 Him
Page 233 and 234:
CHAP. VHl. of Freewill. 2 1 7 when
Page 235 and 236:
CHAP vin. of Freewill. 219 because
Page 237 and 238:
CHAP. viir. of Freewill. 221 bondag
Page 239 and 240:
CHAP. VIII. of Freewill. 22, which
Page 241 and 242:
CHAP. vni. of Freewill. We have, th
Page 243 and 244:
CHAP. viir. of Freewill. 227 action
Page 245 and 246:
CHAP. viir. of Freewill. 229 of the
Page 247 and 248:
CHAP. vin. of Freewill. 231 into a
Page 249 and 250:
CHIP. vm. of Freewill. 233 existenc
Page 251 and 252:
CHAP. ix. of Necessity. 235 formed
Page 253 and 254:
CHAP. rx. of Necessity. 237 was the
Page 255 and 256:
CHAP. ix. of Necessity. 239 made be
Page 257 and 258:
CHAP. ix. of Necessity. 241 causes
Page 259 and 260:
CHAP. rx. of Necessity. 243 that wh
Page 261 and 262:
CHAP. ix. of Necessity. 245 But evi
Page 263 and 264:
CHAP. IX. of Necessity. 247 conduct
Page 265 and 266:
CHAP. ix. of Necessity. 249 But if
Page 267 and 268:
OHA?. ix. of Necessity. 251 reply e
Page 269 and 270:
ix. of Necessity. 253 different arg
Page 271 and 272:
CHAP. TX. of Necessity. 255 substan
Page 273 and 274:
CHAP. TX. of Necessity. 257 is evid
Page 275 and 276:
CHAP. x. Scholastic Doctrine of Pre
Page 277 and 278:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 261 The
Page 279 and 280:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 263 as
Page 281 and 282:
CHAP. x. of Prcdtstination. 265 in
Page 283 and 284:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 267 To
Page 285 and 286:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 269 arb
Page 287 and 288:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 271 and
Page 289 and 290:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 273 Fir
Page 291 and 292:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 275 the
Page 293 and 294:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 277 tio
Page 295 and 296:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 279 sar
Page 297 and 298:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 281 tiv
Page 299 and 300:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 283 hon
Page 301 and 302:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 285 thu
Page 303 and 304:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 287 vin
Page 305 and 306:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 289 men
Page 307 and 308:
CHAP. x. of Predestination. 291 hea
Page 309 and 310:
CHAP. xi. Conclusion. 293 check to
Page 311 and 312:
CHAP. xi. Conclusion. 295 than any
Page 313 and 314:
CHAP. xi. Conclusion. 297 simple ap
Page 315 and 316:
CHAP. xi. Conclusion. 299 and other
Page 317 and 318:
CHAP. xr. Conclusion. 301 these dev
Page 319 and 320:
CHAP. xi. Conclusion. 30^ \j j know
Page 321 and 322:
CFAP. xi. Conclusion. 305 on this q
Page 323 and 324:
CHAP. xr. Conclusion. 307 and Augus
Page 325 and 326:
CHAP. xi. Conclusion. 309 desire as
Page 327 and 328:
CHAP. xr. Conclusion. 311 nature wh
Page 329 and 330:
CHAP. XI. Conclusion. $ 1 3 in the
Page 331 and 332:
CHAP. xi. Conclusion. 315 even migh
Page 333 and 334:
CHAP. xi. Conclusion. 317 as the on
Page 335 and 336:
CHAP. XT. Conclusion. from each oth
Page 337 and 338:
TOPLADT says, NOTES. NOTE I. p. 4.
Page 339 and 340:
Note III. 323 NOTE III. p. 10. AQUI
Page 341 and 342:
Note IV. 325 advantage in the argum
Page 343 and 344:
Note V. 327 ground on this question
Page 345 and 346:
Note V. 329 can predict any physica
Page 347 and 348:
Note V. position which naturally an
Page 349 and 350:
Note V. 333 any rationale which sto
Page 351 and 352:
Note V. 335 agency, only apparently
Page 353 and 354:
Note V. 337 No argument on the side
Page 355 and 356:
Note VI. 339 own sin and not anothe
Page 357 and 358:
Note VII. avoid, will not so easily
Page 359 and 360:
Note VIL 343 for the act is not con
Page 361 and 362:
Note VII. 345 of the doctrine of or
Page 363 and 364:
Note VII. 347 .answers Ad Orthodoxo
Page 365 and 366: Note VII. 349 justice." The re
Page 367 and 368: Note_ VIII. 35 1 Acts xiii. 48, As
Page 369 and 370: Note VIII. 353 men, is that of one
Page 371 and 372: Note VIII. 355 meaning to them. And
Page 373 and 374: Note VIII. 357 hath any, would quic
Page 375 and 376: Note VIII. 359 and that without any
Page 377 and 378: Note X. 361 verat litigavit. De Don
Page 379 and 380: Note X. 363 dedit; ita quoque cujus
Page 381 and 382: Note XL 365 perficiatur in homine,
Page 383 and 384: Note XII. 367 aliquando Deus ut dis
Page 385 and 386: Note XII. 369 the subject, must eve
Page 387 and 388: Note XII. 37 r claims on James, or
Page 389 and 390: Note XIII. 373 the better construer
Page 391 and 392: Note XIV. 375 one a promise of reli
Page 393 and 394: __Note XIV. 377 first, as contained
Page 395 and 396: Note XV. 379 dants of Adam. Tertull
Page 397 and 398: NoteXVL Socriv TWV svfttftiVKOiwv y
Page 399 and 400: Note XVIII. 3 83 perfecta sunt ad p
Page 401 and 402: Note XVIII. 385 tione clarescat, co
Page 403 and 404: Note XIX. 387 tinateth, it calleth,
Page 405 and 406: Note XX. 389 (rod by the inward gra
Page 407 and 408: Note XX. 391 moned by Hinckmar, con
Page 409 and 410: Note XXL 393 nationis et perditioni
Page 411 and 412: Note XXL 395 Christian of any schoo
Page 413 and 414: Note XXL 397 inde salutem hiantes e
Page 415: Note XXL 399 transfert; sed resider
Page 419 and 420: Note XXL 403 the pouvoir prochain t
Page 421 and 422: Note XXL 405 nent qu on resiste eff
Page 423 and 424: Note XXL 407 volonte de Dieu ne peu
Page 425 and 426: Note XXL 409 man s power to resist
Page 429: BT MOZLEY &10 A TREATISE ON THE jjg
show all

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?