07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that neither system was fully automated; each involved some degree of manual<br />

preprocessing. The CMU/Pitt team (Cohen et al., 2001) required less manual<br />

preprocessing than the UCSD/Salk team (Bartlett et al., 2001). Both systems<br />

were tested with spontaneous facial behavior video recorded from a prior study<br />

of deception (Frank and Ekman, 1997). However, no analysis was made of<br />

AUs based on deception/truth-telling conditions. Only two AU categories were<br />

recognized: eye blinks (see the section on “Eye Blinks, Saccades and Fixations”<br />

below) and brow region movement. The CMU/Pitt team recognized AUs in the<br />

brow region with 57% accuracy, and the UCSD/Salk team recognized brow raises<br />

with 91% accuracy and discriminated between brow raises and brow lowering<br />

with 94% accuracy. All of these accuracies were based on agreement with human<br />

coders.<br />

Since these first efforts in 2001, two real-time, fully automated systems have<br />

been developed to recognize facial expressions (Tian et al., 2003; Littlewort et<br />

al., 2004). Both systems classify facial expressions according to the following<br />

emotion categories: happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, anger, and neutral.<br />

One significant difference in the testing of these two systems is that Littlewort<br />

et al. (2004) tested their system on a group of subjects instructed to generate<br />

a specific series of facial expressions, whereas Tian et al. (2003) tested their<br />

system on subjects looking at other subjects who displayed spontaneous facial<br />

expressions. This difference is relevant for real-world applications because it has<br />

been shown that spontaneous facial expressions differ from posed expressions in<br />

several ways (Ekman, 1991).<br />

Potential<br />

Spontaneous facial expression measures can be recorded non-intrusively,<br />

and without the subject’s awareness, provided there is direct line of sight. The<br />

measures can be made in real time via portable technology (a video camera and<br />

computer system capable of high-speed image processing). However, to date<br />

there has been no research into an automated means of measuring deception on<br />

the basis of facial expressions. Measurements of facial expressions and deception<br />

have been limited to manual coding by trained humans, which is labor intensive,<br />

human-observer dependent, and difficult to standardize. Significant research<br />

efforts are required to determine whether FACS measurements are sufficient for<br />

an automated system to distinguish between truth and deception; that is, whether<br />

measures of additional factors, such as body posture and tone of voice, might be<br />

necessary.<br />

Eye Blinks, Saccades, and Fixations<br />

An eye blink occurs when one or both eyes are closed and opened rapidly.<br />

Ocular movements are typically divided into fixations and saccades. A saccade is<br />

a rapid, intermittent eye movement that occurs when the eyes look quickly from<br />

one thing to another. The human eye saccades because only the central part of the<br />

retina has a high concentration of color-sensitive nerve endings that are capable<br />

of formulating a high-resolution mental map of the scene being viewed. The eye<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!