07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Perhaps the most important single trait of individuals who have<br />

demonstrated long-term success in HUMINT operations is an exceptional<br />

aptitude for dealing with ambiguity. Whether this characteristic can be<br />

reliably measured remains to be seen.<br />

The “Magic” of Rapport: 35 The Emotional Component<br />

of <strong>Interrogation</strong><br />

One general observation is introduced now, however, because it<br />

is considered basic to the establishment of rapport, upon which<br />

the success of non-coercive interrogation depends…The skilled<br />

interrogator can save a great deal of time by understanding the<br />

emotional needs of the interrogatee. Most people confronted by<br />

an official — and dimly powerful — representative of a foreign<br />

power will get down to cases much faster if made to feel, from<br />

the start, that they are being treated as individuals. 36<br />

Despite the impressive success achieved by interrogators who have mastered<br />

the skill of effectively establishing rapport with a source — the celebrated<br />

Luftwaffe interrogator Hanns Scharff 37 providing but one well-known example<br />

— methods for rapport-building continue to receive relatively little attention in<br />

current interrogation training programs. There seems to be an unfounded yet<br />

widespread presumption that all persons inherently possess the skills necessary<br />

for building rapport and therefore do not require any supplemental training to<br />

hone this ability. While the KUBARK manual has gained a degree of infamy<br />

through its association with coercive means, it also, in an interesting stroke of<br />

irony, consistently emphasizes the value of rapport-building as an essential tool<br />

for the interrogator.<br />

The devaluation of rapport — that is, building an operational accord with<br />

a source — as an effective means of gaining compliance from a resistant source<br />

is in large measure the product of the misguided public debate over the role of<br />

interrogation in the Global War on Terror, one that seems invariably to focus<br />

on the “ticking bomb” scenario. The point can be safely made that for every<br />

instance where a source might have information about an imminent, catastrophic<br />

terrorist event, there are hundreds (possibly thousands) of interrogations where<br />

the information requirements are far less urgent and the opportunity exists for a<br />

35<br />

Rapport is one of the interrogator’s most powerful tools in gaining a source’s cooperation. It<br />

must be made clear that, in the context of an interrogation, the term “rapport” is not limited to the idea<br />

of friendship that builds between two individuals (although this may actually occur over the course<br />

of an extended interrogation). For the purposes of this paper, the term will be used to imply a state<br />

in which a degree of accord, conformity, and or/affinity is present within a relationship. Source: Jerry<br />

Richardson, The Magic of Rapport (Capitola, CA: Meta Publications, 1987), 13.<br />

36<br />

KUBARK, 11.<br />

37<br />

Raymond F. Toliver, The Interrogator: The Story of Hanns Joachim Scharff, Master Interrogator<br />

of the Luftwaffe (Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing, Ltd., 1997).<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!