07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Make Submission Tolerable<br />

The suspect will be more likely to confess — which the authors suggest<br />

involves the surrender of “his very being and his own free will and destiny into<br />

the hands of the interrogator” — if the interrogator has conveyed objectivity,<br />

sincerity, and sympathy. 510<br />

Encourage Acquiescence and Pursue Indicators of Compliance<br />

At the first signs that a suspect is responding to the interrogator’s suggestions,<br />

the interrogator should “begin to diminish other confession-inhibiting factors and<br />

promote incentives to confess” through theme development such as that suggested<br />

by Reid (discounting fear, minimization, etc.). 511<br />

Consolidate Accomplishments<br />

“When a criminal violator does submit and agrees to cooperate, the gain<br />

should be immediately consolidated and rendered as irreversible as possible.” 512<br />

Aubry<br />

Aubry takes a far less standardized approach to the interrogation process, and<br />

indeed presents no schema for it. Instead, Aubry’s text lists the various approaches<br />

and then discusses the utility of each. Like the other authors, he observes that<br />

interrogation techniques “depend upon the subject’s degree of implication and<br />

participation in the crime; the facts pertinent to his apprehension; the amount<br />

and type of evidence that links him with the crime; and the manner in which he<br />

participated in the crime.” 513<br />

Aubry begins by listing what he calls the various interrogation approaches<br />

and explaining their respective utility. These are:<br />

1. Direct approach – best “where the guilt of the subject is certain, or<br />

reasonably certain;”<br />

2. Indirect approach – best “where the degree of guilt is indicated with<br />

something less than reasonable certitude;”<br />

3. Emotional approach – depends on the personal qualities of the suspect<br />

— religious, emotional, etc.;<br />

4. Subterfuge – “a very effective approach,” but should only be used if<br />

the guilt of the suspect is “reasonably certain,” the “so-called standard<br />

approaches have been tried and have failed,” and the interrogator is very<br />

skilled and experienced in interrogation. 514<br />

The variations on these broad approaches mirror many of the themes that the<br />

Reid Technique suggests in Step 2, and include:<br />

510<br />

Id., p. 122.<br />

511<br />

Id.<br />

512<br />

Id., p. 128.<br />

513<br />

Aubry and Caputo, see note 406, p. 91.<br />

514<br />

Id., p. 75-77.<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!