07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Social Events<br />

The first type of social influence that an interrogation exerts upon the subject<br />

is isolation from his or her family and friends. 221 <strong>Interrogation</strong> manuals commonly<br />

place great emphasis on isolating the suspect from any external influence that may<br />

reduce his or her willingness to confess. 222 The second kind of social influence,<br />

police pressure, relates to the nature of the interrogation itself. 223 As is illustrated<br />

by the Reid Model described above, the social process and interaction between<br />

interrogator and subject is an important factor in obtaining a confession. In this<br />

context, the immediate consequence of confessing is social reinforcement by<br />

the police interrogators, who might praise the subject for cooperation and for<br />

owning up to what he or she has done. 224 Additionally, the subject may be allowed<br />

access to visitors such as family members and, in some cases, may be allowed<br />

to go home. 225 The long-term consequences commonly involve the defendant’s<br />

having to come to terms with social disapproval from the media and the general<br />

public. 226<br />

Emotional Events<br />

Being arrested and brought to a police station is an undoubtedly stressful<br />

event. Generally, suspects can be expected to experience considerable levels of<br />

anxiety and distress, caused mainly by the uncertainty of the situation, the fear<br />

of what will happen at the station, the fear of being locked in a cell, and the fear<br />

of the consequences regarding the offense. 227 There are two distinct emotional<br />

experiences relevant to confessions: guilt and shame. 228 Shame is best viewed as a<br />

degrading, humiliating experience, and it often accompanies a sense of exposure. 229<br />

In contrast, guilt is associated with some real or imagined past transgression that<br />

is inconsistent with the person’s internalized values and standards. 230 Whereas a<br />

feeling of guilt motivates people to confess, a feeling of shame has the reverse<br />

effect. 231 After confessing, suspects may experience a sense of emotional<br />

relief as the immediate pressure is lifted and they have greater certainty about<br />

their immediate future. 232 However, at the prospect that the subject’s role in or<br />

commission of the crime will become known, a feeling of shame sometimes sets<br />

in or becomes exacerbated. 233<br />

221<br />

Id., p. 126.<br />

222<br />

Id.<br />

223<br />

Id.<br />

224<br />

Id.<br />

225<br />

Id.<br />

226<br />

Id.<br />

227<br />

Id.<br />

228<br />

Id.<br />

229<br />

Id.<br />

230<br />

Id.<br />

231<br />

Id.<br />

232<br />

Id.<br />

233<br />

Id., p. 127.<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!