07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

source pool. The disciplined interrogator must constantly battle the tendency to<br />

expect, and subsequently to look for, commonalities from one source to another.<br />

This is especially true when dealing with sources from a foreign and possibly<br />

little-understood culture and linguistic background. While a studied awareness<br />

of culture is important in planning for the exploitation of a given source, that<br />

newfound understanding can also cause the interrogator to catch only the cultural<br />

overtones and miss the individual nuances that would prove critical to gaining<br />

compliance.<br />

The effort to build a useful model of the interrogation process must begin<br />

with a conceptual framework. Important components of that framework are<br />

flexibility, individuality, and constant adaptability. Inherent in the underlying<br />

philosophy is the requirement to search for general trends and individual nuance,<br />

commonalities and unique differences.<br />

Ultimately, the successful model must generate an effective strategy for<br />

successful performance in keeping with the Law of Requisite Variety, a principle<br />

drawn from the study of cybernetics with remarkable application to the context<br />

of interrogation. 52 Cybernetic theory suggests that in the competition between<br />

two processes within a closed system, the one with greater variety of options<br />

will be successful. Applying the Law of Requisite Variety to the context of an<br />

interrogation, the individual with the larger number of available options (e.g.,<br />

strategies, behaviors, etc.) should prevail. It is therefore of great importance that<br />

the interrogator always have at least one more method of leveraging compliance<br />

than the source has for resisting. 53<br />

Saving Face: Helping the Source to Concede<br />

Another key to the successful interrogation of the resisting<br />

source is the provision of an acceptable rationalization for<br />

yielding. As regression proceeds, almost all resisters feel the<br />

growing internal stress that results from wanting simultaneously<br />

to conceal and divulge…To escape the mounting tension, the<br />

source may grasp at any face-saving reason for compliance —<br />

any explanation which will placate both his own conscience<br />

and the possible wrath of former superiors and associates if<br />

he is returned to [his place of origin]. It is the business of the<br />

interrogator to provide the right rationalization at the right time.<br />

Here too the importance of understanding the interrogatee is<br />

evident; the right rationalization must be an excuse or reason<br />

that is tailored to the source’s personality. 54<br />

52<br />

Essentially, the Law of Requisite Variety states that the greater the variety of actions<br />

available to a control system, the larger the variety of perturbations (i.e., challenges to<br />

its control) for which it is able to compensate. (Source: Principia Cybernetic Web, URL:<br />

http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/REQVAR.html )<br />

53<br />

Richardson, The Magic of Rapport, 15-17.<br />

54<br />

KUBARK, 41.<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!