07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

influence or promote compliance in populations relevant to this inquiry. One<br />

notable research program (MKULTRA), which ultimately was shut down by the<br />

U.S. government because of ethical concerns, suggested that these techniques<br />

led to changes in behavior, making at least some persons more passive and<br />

pliable. However, although it was designed to inform interrogations, most of the<br />

research was not conducted in the context of interrogation. The 1963 “KUBARK<br />

Counterintelligence <strong>Interrogation</strong>” Manual reflects some of the perceived<br />

implications of this line of research. Strikingly, since that time very little empirical<br />

research has been conducted on these techniques and the ways in which they may<br />

or may not affect relevant interrogation outcomes.<br />

Torture<br />

Much of the social science research on the issue of torture may not apply to<br />

the process of educing information. The term “torture” is used with very little<br />

consistency in the literature. One basic distinction is between torture used for<br />

punishment and torture used for leverage (to facilitate compliance or to elicit<br />

information). The tactics, effects, and resistance strategies may be quite different<br />

from one type to the next. Research does exist on the social and psychological<br />

consequences of torture (e.g., Somnier et al, 1992) but not on the applicability of<br />

those effects to educing information.<br />

Evidence from social science suggests that there are similarities in the<br />

psychological effects of torture and of internment as a Prisoner of War. Among<br />

the common features are enforced captivity, fear and terror, pain and suffering,<br />

and shame and humiliation. A feeling of powerlessness has been posited as the<br />

central component of humiliation. It is possible that future research about the<br />

experiences of POWs who have been tortured while in captivity in past wars may<br />

help to inform some questions about torture that relate to educing information.<br />

Pain and Physical Discomfort<br />

Although pain is commonly regarded as a facilitator of compliance or<br />

diminisher of resistance, there appears to have been little or no empirical research<br />

addressing these questions. The PsycINFO database contains embedded topic<br />

headings for terms such as “Resistance,” “Aversive Stimuli,” “Pain,” “Attitude<br />

Change,” and Compliance,” yet, there are virtually no “hits” and definitely no<br />

relevant hits for any given pair of these predictor and outcome terms. For example,<br />

among thousands of articles on each topic individually, there are no articles at the<br />

intersection of “aversive stimuli” and “resistance.”<br />

Reports about the treatment of POWs and foreign prisoners in China<br />

documented the use of physical abuse, but studies of the role of assault in<br />

promoting attitude change and in eliciting false confessions (even from U.S.<br />

servicemen) revealed that it was ineffective. Belief change and compliance was<br />

more likely when physical abuse was minimal or absent (Biderman 1960).<br />

Sleep Loss/Deprivation<br />

Sleep loss/deprivation is associated with:<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!