07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cop’s wishes, a nasty, humiliating, esteem-deflating, or even<br />

dangerous interaction with a bad cop will be the next step.” 535<br />

The hypothetical bad cop need not even be mentioned explicitly,<br />

but the threat should be clear. 536<br />

5. Good cop in contrast to expectations of bad cop<br />

The interrogator presents himself as warm and friendly to a<br />

suspect “who expects to encounter coldness and hostility;”<br />

this has the effect of “amplify[ing] the construed positiveness<br />

of the” interrogator. 537 This technique is most successful with<br />

those suspects who seemed scared, anxious, or suspicious of<br />

the interrogator. 538<br />

The strategy behind each of the variations was the same: “create a perceptual<br />

contrast for [the] targets, which is proposed to accentuate the construed<br />

positiveness of displayed positive emotions and the construed negativeness<br />

of displayed negative emotions” in order to induce compliance in the target. 539<br />

According to Rafaeli et al., three mechanisms came into play that made GC/BC<br />

successful. First, the “accentuated anxiety” with which the suspect may respond<br />

to the bad cop leads to “accentuated relief” in response to good cops. 540 As a result,<br />

suspects may comply with the good cop’s requests to escape from the anxiety or<br />

fear they feel during interactions with bad cops or expect to feel during future<br />

interactions. 541<br />

Second, the GC/BC contrast accentuates the suspect’s perception that the<br />

good cop is kind and helpful, resulting in pressure “to reciprocate the kindness<br />

by complying with the good cop’s wishes.” 542 This occurs because the “actual or<br />

hypothetical contrasting unpleasant person” creates the impression that the good<br />

cop’s positive feelings are “especially unusual and pronounced.” 543<br />

Third, because the suspect develops “accentuated feelings of relief in response<br />

to [the] good cop,” and (it is hoped) comes to believe he is kind and helpful, a<br />

feeling of trust develops. 544 Once the suspect believes that the good cop is truthful<br />

and “truly concerned for [the suspect’s] well-being,” it becomes easier for the<br />

interrogator to convince the suspect that compliance is in his own best interest. 545<br />

In essence, all five variations, as well as the three identified mechanisms,<br />

rely on building rapport between the good cop and the suspect, much like that<br />

535<br />

Id., p. 763.<br />

536<br />

Id.<br />

537<br />

Id., p. 764.<br />

538<br />

Id.<br />

539<br />

Id., p. 752.<br />

540<br />

Id., p. 764.<br />

541<br />

Id.<br />

542<br />

Id., p. 764-765.<br />

543<br />

Id.<br />

544<br />

Id., p. 765.<br />

545<br />

Id.<br />

196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!