07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6. Using the “size-up,” the investigator should then determine the<br />

approach that will be most useful for this type of suspect. 452<br />

Similarly, Vrij suggests that during the interview, the investigator must “avoid<br />

guilt assumption and belief perseverance,” must be open-minded and flexible,<br />

should establish rapport, and should provide little information about the case to<br />

avoid making it easier for the suspect to lie or come up with explanations. 453<br />

Types of Questions for the Interview<br />

As a complement to the various interview techniques, it is helpful to consider<br />

the types of questions that an investigator should ask. Most of the authorities<br />

agree on this aspect, which is laid out most clearly by Dillon in his work on The<br />

Practice of Questioning. He classifies several types of questions used during the<br />

various stages of the interrogation. According to him, the questions should be<br />

prepared beforehand and written down on paper (though no other author makes<br />

this suggestion, as it would seem to inhibit flexibility). 454 The questions, according<br />

to Dillon, should be asked in the following order, by type:<br />

1. Opening questions – used at the start of the interview and<br />

designed to “get the respondent talking,” these should be yes-no<br />

questions that are easy to answer and are not about the crime;<br />

2. Free narrative questions – the investigator names a topic<br />

and asks the suspect to tell what he knows about it, allowing<br />

the suspect to describe a topic in his own words while the<br />

investigator listens without interrupting;<br />

3. Direct questions – follows up on narrative questions by asking<br />

about specific items while avoiding value-laden terms such as<br />

“murder,” “rape,” etc. The investigator should order his questions<br />

A) from the general to the specific, and B) from the known to<br />

the unknown;<br />

4. Cross-questioning – questions designed to check and verify<br />

one answer against another, delving into problematic (i.e.,<br />

contradictory or ambiguous) answers; the suspect is asked to<br />

repeat his statements “by means of questions asked in different<br />

ways and in no special order;”<br />

5. Review questions – used to confirm previous answers, repeating<br />

the information and asking ‘Is that correct’ and ‘What else’ 455<br />

452<br />

Id., p. 151-162.<br />

453<br />

Aldert Vrij, ‘“We Will Protect Your Wife and Child, but Only If You Confess’: Police<br />

<strong>Interrogation</strong>s in England and the Netherlands,” in Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Justice:<br />

Psychological Perspectives on Criminal Systems, Peter J. van Koppen and Steven D. Penrod, eds.<br />

(New York: Plenum, 2003), 57-79.<br />

454<br />

J. T. Dillon, The Practice of Questioning (London: Routledge, 1990), 82.<br />

455<br />

Id. p. 85-91.<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!