07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

During this same period, the study of non-coercive interrogation methods to<br />

support intelligence collection received only modest interest. <strong>Interrogation</strong> tactics,<br />

techniques, and procedures established in the Cold War era fell short in building<br />

upon the legacy of World War II strategic interrogation operations. Instead,<br />

contemporary interrogation doctrine and training curricula were developed without<br />

the benefit of formal studies of the potential efficacy of offensive interrogation 684<br />

methods. In sum, a considerable portion of “what we know” about interrogation<br />

— including approach methodology, the detection of deception, and reading body<br />

language — is in fact largely unsubstantiated. Thus, when the Global War on<br />

Terror focused us anew on devising offensive interrogation methods, the product<br />

was at times adulterated by the principles of coercive interrogation drawn from<br />

studies of Communist methodologies. As this war has continued, evidence of<br />

the employment of coercive methods by U.S. interrogators has appeared with<br />

alarming frequency.<br />

The opportunity currently presents itself to make a transition to the next<br />

generation of educing information. The strategies that will form the foundation<br />

for the third generation of doctrine and practice for educing information will<br />

be driven by the need to overcome the barriers outlined in this paper. The effort<br />

should be characterized by the following considerations:<br />

• Methods will be consistent with long-standing U.S. legal and moral<br />

traditions.<br />

• Formal research will, whenever possible, seek to demonstrate the efficacy<br />

of methods in an operational setting.<br />

• Institutions will recognize that the complexity of challenges in<br />

interrogation is on par with those of clandestine collection operations.<br />

• Standards of conduct and formal vetting programs will be introduced<br />

to limit recruitment to those individuals best suited to dealing with the<br />

complexities and ambiguities of interrogation.<br />

• The long-term examination of selected high-value sources will take place<br />

under exacting standards and be subject to appropriate oversight.<br />

• Rigorous requirements for initial and ongoing training,<br />

accompanied by an unambiguous standard of ethics and<br />

practices, will introduce a new level of professionalism into the<br />

interrogation discipline.<br />

The barriers to success in educing information, while formidable, are not<br />

insurmountable. That these barriers still confront us reflects not necessarily the<br />

complexity of the barriers per se, but rather the absence of a systematic effort to<br />

address them. In this regard, the words of Colin Powell, former Chairman of Joint<br />

684<br />

The Joint Forces Command of the Department of Defense has labeled interrogation operations<br />

conducted for the purpose of collecting intelligence from foreign sources offensive interrogation,<br />

whereas resistance to interrogation is referred to as defensive interrogation.<br />

265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!