07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Finally, Sturgeon mentioned that although videotaping interrogations in<br />

Britain has drastically reduced the number of complaints filed by subjects against<br />

interrogators, some suspects are more reluctant than others to talk when being<br />

recorded. However, British law allows for recorders to be turned off at the<br />

suspect’s request.<br />

Section 11. Videotaping <strong>Interrogation</strong>s: The Law and<br />

Practice<br />

Law enforcement officials around the country are currently debating whether<br />

or not videotaping of custodial interrogations should be required. Electronic<br />

recording of interviews and interrogations, when feasible, has been required by<br />

judicial opinion in Alaska since 1985 598 and in Minnesota since 1994, 599 although<br />

neither specifies videotaping. Illinois recently passed a statute requiring electronic<br />

recording, when feasible, of all custodial interrogations of suspects, 600 a District<br />

of Columbia statute requires it for all suspects in violent or dangerous crimes, 601<br />

and a Maine statute requires electronic recording of interrogations for serious<br />

crimes. 602 The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently ruled that while<br />

it would not require electronic recordings of interrogations, where such recording<br />

did not take place “the defendant is entitled (on request) to a jury instruction<br />

advising that the State’s highest court has expressed a preference that such<br />

interrogations be recorded whenever practicable, and cautioning the jury that,<br />

because of the absence of any recording of the interrogation in the case before<br />

them, they should weigh evidence of the defendant’s alleged statement with<br />

great caution and care.” 603 As noted previously, this has led to all interrogations<br />

conducted in Massachusetts being recorded whenever feasible. 604 Various similar<br />

legislative proposals are currently or have previously been before legislatures<br />

around the country, including in New York City, Maryland, Connecticut, Oregon,<br />

and Missouri. 605<br />

Electronic recording of interviews is quite common in other countries. As<br />

noted, Great Britain has required it since 1984. 606 Australian police must taperecord<br />

their interrogations where feasible, and in federal prosecutions, where<br />

a contemporaneous recording cannot be made, the law requires an electronic<br />

598<br />

Stephan v. State, 711 P.2d 1156 (Alaska.1985).<br />

599<br />

State v. Scales, 518 N.W. 2d 587 (Minn.1994).<br />

600<br />

725 ILCS 5 § 103-2.1, effective 18 July 2005.<br />

601<br />

D.C. ST § 5-133.20, effective 4 April 2003.<br />

602<br />

Maine LD 891.<br />

603<br />

Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 442 Mass. 423, 447-48 (2004).<br />

604<br />

Interview with Boston Police Department Deputy Superintendent Dan Coleman, in Boston, MA<br />

(11 March 2005) [hereinafter Coleman Interview].<br />

605<br />

See Report on the Electronic Recording of Police <strong>Interrogation</strong>s, submitted jointly by the<br />

American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section and the New York County Lawyers’ Association,<br />

(2002), 9, at http://www.reid.com/pdfs/NYlegalarticleonvideotaping.pdf, for a non-updated list, site<br />

access 22 April 2005) [hereinafter Report]<br />

606<br />

Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!