07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VI. Consume Resistance<br />

A longstanding maxim of interrogation training is that “every man has his<br />

breaking point.” In the social science literature, the concept that comes closest to<br />

that of breaking is regulatory depletion, which postulates that the human capacity<br />

to control one’s own responses (self-regulation) draws on a finite and limited<br />

resource. Regulation requires effort and that effort uses up some of a person’s<br />

regulatory energy, so that less is available for subsequent responses (Muraven,<br />

Tice and Baumeister, 1998, 775).<br />

Existing research suggests that one common and modestly sized store of<br />

energy fuels any and all forms of regulatory activity. Theoretically, then, one’s<br />

regulatory capacity could be entirely depleted. However, repeated cycles of<br />

exertion and restoration may serve to strengthen regulatory capacity and perhaps<br />

make subjects more resilient (Baumeister, Muraven, and Tice, 2000; Strayhorn,<br />

2002); thus, overwhelming or depleting a person’s resistance in the short term<br />

may be theoretically possible, but may impose a cost in the longer term.<br />

VII. Use Resistance to Promote Change<br />

Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time, and it<br />

annoys the pig.<br />

One of the most intriguing approaches to getting past resistance is to use it.<br />

The theory and concepts behind the idea of using resistance draw from several<br />

sources, including the work of psychotherapists Victor Frankl and Milton Erickson,<br />

who used unconventional strategies (for example, telling an insomniac to try to<br />

stay awake) to bypass their patients’ resistance and effect therapeutic change<br />

(Weeks and L’Abate, 1982). Examples include what is popularly called “reverse<br />

psychology”; the professional term commonly ascribed to this technique is<br />

“paradoxical intention.” Other studies suggest that acknowledging (or preempting)<br />

resistance can help to reduce it, for example, by preceding a persuasive message<br />

by saying something like: “I know you’re determined not to listen to anything I say,<br />

but…” When this works, it appears that the target resists the acknowledgement or<br />

suggestion of resistance (Linn and Knowles, 2002).<br />

Although Hans Gerz (Frankl, 1967) is said to have claimed that paradoxical<br />

intention is successful in 80–90% of cases, many of the documented successes<br />

are anecdotal and are ascribed to a small cadre of “master” therapists. Findings<br />

garnered over the last 15 years suggest that these techniques may only work for<br />

people who are inclined to resist direct suggestions.<br />

Implications<br />

Research findings support the idea that different strategies may be required<br />

for different sources (and maybe even under different conditions). In a context in<br />

which information is being educed, different sources will have different degrees<br />

of, and strategies for, resisting. An educer must constantly assess and monitor<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!