07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in mind the possibility that the person is lying, but consider this as only<br />

one of the possible reasons for this mismatch.<br />

3. Attention should be directed towards deviations from a person’s “normal”<br />

or usual patterns of behaviour, if these are known. The explanation for<br />

such deviations should be established. Each deviation may indicate that<br />

the person is lying, but do not disregard other explanations for these<br />

deviations.<br />

4. The judgement of untruthfulness should only be made when all other<br />

possible explanations have been negated.<br />

5. A person suspected of deception should be encouraged to talk. This is<br />

necessary to negate the alternative options regarding a person’s behaviour.<br />

Moreover, the more a liar talks, the more likely it is that they [sic] will<br />

finally give their lies away via verbal and/or non-verbal cues (as they<br />

continuously have to pay attention to both speech content and non-verbal<br />

behaviour).<br />

6. There are stereotyped ideas about cues to deception (such as gaze aversion,<br />

fidgeting, and so on), which research has shown to be unreliable indicators<br />

of deception. The actual indicators are listed in Chapter 2 [see discussion<br />

above]. These can be a guide, but bear in mind that not everyone will<br />

exhibit these cues during deception, and the presence of such cues may<br />

indicate deception, but does not do so in every case. 560<br />

Based on his research, Vrij identifies the “seven aspects [that] characterize<br />

a good liar: i) being well prepared; (ii) being original; (iii) thinking quickly; (iv)<br />

being eloquent; (v) having a good memory; (vi) not experiencing feelings of fear,<br />

guilt of duping, delight while lying; and (vii) being good at acting.” 561 In theory, if<br />

the interrogator can recognize these character aspects, he can at least identify the<br />

suspect who will be better at lying, and thus can search more closely for clues to<br />

the occurrence of deception. Indeed, Vrij lays out guidelines for the interrogator<br />

who must overcome the good liar’s deceit and detect the deceptions:<br />

1. Be suspicious;<br />

2. Be probing;<br />

3. Do not reveal important information;<br />

4. Be informed;<br />

5. Ask liars to repeat what they have said before;<br />

6. Watch and listen carefully and abandon stereotypes;<br />

7. Compare liars’ behavior with their natural behavior. 562<br />

Ultimately, Vrij comes to a similar conclusion as that implied by the BSA<br />

used in the Reid Technique: observe the baseline behavior of the suspect, and then<br />

560<br />

Id., p. 98, Box 3.3.<br />

561<br />

Id., p. 210.<br />

562<br />

Id., p. 222-225.<br />

199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!