07.02.2015 Views

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

Educing Information: Interrogation - National Intelligence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

learned to observe and interpret human communication behavior, are introspective<br />

enough to know themselves, [and] have developed a broad-based understanding<br />

of other personalities.” 411 Ideal experience, according to Aubry, includes years of<br />

field investigation, an “apprenticeship” as an interrogator with continual training<br />

and review, as well as studies in psychology, physiology, criminology, sociology,<br />

and basic physical sciences, literature, and English composition courses. 412 Aubry,<br />

however, concedes that a more realistic expectation is a high school diploma<br />

and at least five years of police experience, with at least two of those “spent in<br />

bona fide investigative duties of criminal violations, preferably as a Detective or<br />

Plainclothesman.” 413<br />

Finally, the other texts point out that excellent acting ability is also a<br />

requirement. 414 The interrogator must convey numerous emotions “without<br />

affecting his judgment or revealing any personal emotion about the subject…[and<br />

must] project sincerity” to conduct an interrogation successfully. 415 He should<br />

“have developed the skill to play ‘the game’ in the interview room and temporarily<br />

assume any other personality.” 416 The interrogator must not only be patient, 417 but<br />

also be capable of conveying infinite patience so that the suspect believes the<br />

interrogation will go on indefinitely. 418<br />

Pre-<strong>Interrogation</strong> Fact-Gathering and Analysis<br />

All of the authorities agree that a thorough investigation and analysis<br />

of the facts is essential to a successful interrogation. “An interrogation must<br />

be considered as the highlight and the final act of the investigation which has<br />

preceded it.” 419 The Reid Technique’s “fact analysis” provides a good example of<br />

the type and extent of investigation and fact-gathering that is required before an<br />

interrogation. According to the Reid Technique, when possible, the interrogator<br />

should conduct as much of the investigation as possible for himself and should<br />

not merely read the reports of others. 420 This is not a minor or easy task, as the<br />

Reid Technique (and many of the other texts) requires that the interrogator have<br />

information on:<br />

• The offense itself (including the legal nature of the offensive conduct<br />

and the exact amount and nature of the loss; date, time, and place of<br />

the occurrence in accurate detail; description of the crime area and of<br />

the crime scene itself; the way in which the crime appears to have been<br />

committed and known details of its commission; possible motives for its<br />

commission; incriminating factors regarding a particular suspect);<br />

411<br />

Stan B. Walters, Principles of Kinesic Interview and <strong>Interrogation</strong> (UK: CRC Press, 1996), xi.<br />

412<br />

Aubry and Caputo, see note 406, p. 51.<br />

413<br />

Id. p. 51.<br />

414<br />

Id., p. 44; Royal and Schutt, see note 407, p. 65-66.<br />

415<br />

Id.<br />

416<br />

Walters, see note 411, p. xi.<br />

417<br />

Inbau, see note 109, p. 66.<br />

418<br />

Aubry and Caputo, see note 406, p. 60.<br />

419<br />

Id., p. 148.<br />

420<br />

Inbau, see note 109, p. 12.<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!