18.02.2013 Views

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(Fischman <strong>and</strong> Foltin 1991). Another method for assessing the interoceptive effects of<br />

nicotine is the drug discrimination procedure, in which the perceived stimulus effects<br />

can be directly observed (Preston <strong>and</strong> Bigelow 1991).<br />

Nicotine, like other dependence-producing drugs, displays drug discrimination,<br />

inducing changes in the central nervous system that are distinct <strong>and</strong> identifiable.<br />

These changes can be blocked by a central (mecamylamine), but not a peripheral<br />

(trimethaphan) nicotine antagonist, demonstrating that the discriminative stimulus<br />

effects of nicotine are centrally mediated (Perkins et al. 1999b). The discriminative<br />

stimulus effects of nicotine are thought to be critical in underst<strong>and</strong>ing both nicotine<br />

reinforcement <strong>and</strong> addiction as these effects of nicotine may cue further drug-seeking<br />

behavior, supplementing the primary reinforcing effects of nicotine (Jasinski <strong>and</strong><br />

Henningfield 1989; Stolerman <strong>and</strong> Jarvis 1995).<br />

A drug’s discriminative stimulus effect is thought to be closely related to its subjective<br />

effects (Preston <strong>and</strong> Bigelow 1991). However, unlike subjective effects, the discrimination<br />

procedure uses observable behavioral responses to determine whether a drug’s<br />

stimulus effects have been perceived by the subject (Preston <strong>and</strong> Bigelow 1991).<br />

Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine are demonstrated by training subjects<br />

to explicitly associate the drug effect to a specific response that leads to reinforcement<br />

(Di Chiara 2000). In a drug discrimination procedure, subjects learn, through repeated<br />

exposure to the drug, to recognize its interoceptive characteristics <strong>and</strong> employ these<br />

characteristics to discriminate different drugs or different doses of the same drug<br />

(Duka et al. 2002).<br />

Most human drug discrimination studies use a similar testing method (Perkins et al.<br />

1997). Initially, subjects learn to discriminate nicotine from placebo (Discrimination<br />

Training). During discrimination training, subjects are presented with training doses<br />

of nicotine <strong>and</strong> placebo that are labeled ‘A’ <strong>and</strong> ‘B’. During the first presentation of<br />

each, subjects are told which one they received. There are then subsequent presentations,<br />

in r<strong>and</strong>om order, in which subjects must guess if they received ‘A’ or ‘B’<br />

(Discrimination Testing). The criterion for reliable discrimination is at least 80%<br />

correct identification of the letter code with ten or fewer sessions. After reliably<br />

discriminating the training dose of nicotine from placebo, subjects are administered a<br />

range of doses for generalization testing to determine how similar these doses are to<br />

the training doses (‘A’ <strong>and</strong> ‘B’). Using this method, studies have consistently found that<br />

smokers can reliably discriminate nicotine from placebo.<br />

Animal models of nicotine reinforcement<br />

BRIDGETTE E. GARRETT ET AL. 153<br />

Nicotine locomotor stimulant effects<br />

Consistent with its effects in humans, nicotine produces psychostimulant effects in<br />

laboratory animals. Acute nicotine administration produces a dose-dependent, transient<br />

decrease in locomotor activity, followed by a dose-dependent, more prolonged

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!