18.02.2013 Views

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

462<br />

SMOKING AND CERVICAL NEOPLASIA<br />

are unclear, but could reflect a younger age group where current smoking is more<br />

prevalent.<br />

Seven studies report data on both CIN (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) <strong>and</strong> invasive<br />

cancer (Szarewski <strong>and</strong> Cuzick 1998; Hildesheim et al. 2001; Lacey et al. 2001; Zivaljevic<br />

et al. 2001). These studies generally encompass all grades of CIN <strong>and</strong> separate odds<br />

ratios for CIN <strong>and</strong> cancer are not given. All but one of these studies show a positive<br />

relationship with smoking, mostly with a dose–response, with adjusted odds ratios<br />

between 1.6 <strong>and</strong> 7.0 (Fig. 26.4).<br />

Sixteen studies have looked at CIN only, of all grades (Kjaer et al. 1996; Sasagawa et al.<br />

1997; Szarewski <strong>and</strong> Cuzick 1998; Derchain et al. 1999; Scholes et al. 1999). All but one of<br />

these show a positive relationship with smoking, with adjusted odds ratios between 1.4<br />

<strong>and</strong> 5.8 for current versus never smokers (Fig. 26.5). Six studies show a dose–response,<br />

three studies do not, <strong>and</strong> seven do not have appropriate data for this analysis.<br />

It is of interest that some studies which have looked separately at low <strong>and</strong> high<br />

grades of CIN have found that the relationship with smoking tends to be stronger for<br />

the higher grades. For example, in the study by Cuzick et al. (1990), the adjusted odds<br />

ratio for women with CIN 1 was 1.21 (NS), whereas for CIN 3 it was 1.72 (p < 0.05).<br />

Schiffman et al. (1993) found a significant relationship of smoking with CIN 2/3 in<br />

HPV positive smokers (RR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.5), but not in those with low- grade CIN.<br />

Similar results were reported by Vonka et al. (1984), Morrison et al. (1991), Brisson et al.<br />

(1994), Kjaer et al. (1996), <strong>and</strong> Derchain et al. (1999) in which the percentage of<br />

smokers increased steadily from controls to CIN 1, to high-grade CIN or cancer.<br />

Buckley 1981<br />

Vonka 1984*†<br />

Mayberry 1985<br />

Slattery 1989<br />

Zivaljevic 2001<br />

All non-controlled<br />

Hildesheim 2001<br />

Lacey (Adeno) 2001<br />

Lacey (CIN 3) 2001<br />

HPV controlled<br />

Combined<br />

0.3 1 2.5 5 10 25<br />

Odds ratio – log scale<br />

Fig. 26.4 Smoking <strong>and</strong> cervical neoplasia: case–control studies—both cancer <strong>and</strong> CIN.<br />

*Unadjusted; †Heavy exposure group.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!