18.02.2013 Views

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12-year follow-up of the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study I, which<br />

included over one million individuals, a total of 109 deaths from laryngeal cancer was<br />

recorded among men <strong>and</strong> 22 among women (Burns et al. 1996). On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

case–control studies are based on incident cases <strong>and</strong> have often been conducted in<br />

high-risk areas, such as southern Europe <strong>and</strong> South America.<br />

Cigarette smoking<br />

PAOLO BOFFETTA 369<br />

Among men, the risk of laryngeal cancer is increased 5–10 times among ever cigarette<br />

smokers as compared to never smokers. In population-based series, the proportion of<br />

cases who report not having smoked during their lifetime is in the order of 1–5%. In all<br />

studies that have analysed it, a positive trend was found between amount of smoking<br />

<strong>and</strong> risk of laryngeal cancer relative to that of non-smokers. Table 21.1 summarizes the<br />

results of the selected case–control studies. Additional studies provided similar results<br />

for other populations, e.g. Uruguay (De Stefani et al. 1995), Spain (Lopez-Abente et al.<br />

1992), <strong>and</strong> Denmark (Olsen et al. 1985), but they did not fulfil the criteria for inclusion<br />

in Table 21.1. The heterogeneity in the results can be explained by the small number of<br />

non-smoking cases in some of the studies, by the type of tobacco smoked, by differences<br />

in the interactive effect of alcohol drinking, <strong>and</strong> possibly by differences in genetic<br />

susceptibility factors, in addition to differences in the quality of the studies <strong>and</strong> the<br />

validity of the results.<br />

Results from cohort studies are comparable to those available from case–control<br />

studies (e.g. Doll <strong>and</strong> Hill 1954; Dorn 1959; Burch et al. 1981). As an example, Fig. 21.1<br />

shows the relative risk among white men <strong>and</strong> women enrolled in the American Cancer<br />

Society Cancer Prevention Study I (Burns et al. 1996).<br />

Several cohort <strong>and</strong> case–control studies reported a positive dose–response according<br />

to duration of smoking (Falk et al. 1989; Restrepo et al. 1989; Sankaranarayanan et al.<br />

1990; Choi <strong>and</strong> Kahyo 1991; Lopez-Abente et al. 1992; Zheng et al. 1992; Dosemeci<br />

et al. 1997). For example, in the study by Zheng et al. (1992) from China, the odds<br />

ratios were 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4–4.6), 4.1 (1.6–11.1), 12.0 (4.8–30.1),<br />

<strong>and</strong> 13.2 (5.6–31.2) for less than 20 years, 20–29 years, 30–39 years, <strong>and</strong> 40 or more<br />

years of smoking.<br />

Selected results on the effect of quitting are summarized in Table 21.2. No protective<br />

effect is apparent during the first five years after quitting, a phenomenon that can be<br />

partially explained by quitting because of early symptoms of the neoplastic lesion.<br />

After that time, however, there is strong evidence of a decrease in risk of laryngeal cancer.<br />

A higher relative risk was suggested in several studies for deep inhalation of tobacco<br />

smoke, as compared to light or no inhalation (Restrepo et al. 1989; Lopez-Abente et al.<br />

1992; Burns et al. 1996; Lewin et al. 1998). In a study from Uruguay, smokers of<br />

h<strong>and</strong>-rolled cigarettes had a higher risk than smokers of manufactured cigarettes<br />

(De Stefani et al. 1992). Studies from southern Europe <strong>and</strong> South America have<br />

consistently reported a 1.5- to 2-fold stronger risk among smokers of black-tobacco

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!