18.02.2013 Views

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

338<br />

TOBACCO AND WOMEN<br />

BOX 19.1: A PACK OF MARLBORO IS EQUAL TO …<br />

% of Daily Income:<br />

66.3%—China<br />

62.5%—Moldova<br />

62%—Pakistan<br />

60%—Papua New Guinea (BAT’s Benson <strong>and</strong> Hedges)<br />

56%—Ghana<br />

56%—Bangladesh (15% of average income of the wealthiest 5% of the population)<br />

30%—Romania<br />

28%—Bulgaria<br />

14%—France<br />

6%—US (using Marlboro price in Oregon)<br />

Source: Global Partnerships (2001)<br />

consumption (Townsend et al. 1994; USDHHS 1998) <strong>and</strong> postpone initiation of<br />

smoking (Lewit et al. 1997). For example, tax increases in Canada between 1982 <strong>and</strong><br />

1993 led to a steep increase in the real price of cigarettes <strong>and</strong> consumption fell considerably.<br />

When tax was reduced in an attempt to counter smuggling, consumption rose<br />

sharply again until a subsequent tax increase in 1995, when consumption levelled<br />

off (World Bank 1999). Increases in the price of tobacco appears to have a disproportionately<br />

greater impact on low- <strong>and</strong> middle-income countries than in high-income<br />

countries, <strong>and</strong> among lower socio-economic groups in high-income countries<br />

(Townsend et al. 1994).<br />

There has been very little economic research on gender sensitivity to price in developing<br />

countries. Research from developed countries is somewhat conflicting (Jacobs<br />

2001). In the US, for example, it has been found that men, particularly young men, are<br />

most sensitive to price (Lewit et al. 1981; Lewit <strong>and</strong> Coate 1982). While most British<br />

research has concluded that women are more price sensitive than men. Price was found<br />

to have a significant effect on the prevalence of smoking in women in the lowest<br />

socio-economic groups where prevalence is highest. However, the number of cigarettes<br />

smoked by women on low income seemed not to vary with price changes in the<br />

expected way. It has been suggested that while they may respond more than other<br />

groups to price increases by quitting, those who continue to smoke, will smoke<br />

cheaper, smaller, h<strong>and</strong>-rolled, or smuggled cigarettes rather than reduce the number of<br />

cigarettes smoked (Jacobs 2001; Wiltshire et al. 2001).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!