18.02.2013 Views

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

436<br />

SMOKING AND STOMACH CANCER (B)<br />

Cessation of smoking affected the risk of cancer of the stomach. In the populationbased<br />

case–control study from Sweden which included 338 cases of stomach cancer<br />

<strong>and</strong> 678 community controls (Hansson et al. 1994), there was a statistically significant<br />

association between number of years since quitting <strong>and</strong> the risk of stomach cancer<br />

(P for trend = 0.02). In the study of De Stefani et al. (1998) relative risk of stomach<br />

cancer among men who gave up smoking 10–14 years ago was 1.0 (95% CI 0.5–2.1),<br />

while in those who gave up smoking 1–4 years ago relative risk was 2.4 (95%<br />

CI 1.3–3.6), <strong>and</strong> in current smokers was 2.6 (95% CI 1.6–4.1). In the study reported by<br />

De Stefani et al. in 1990, quitting for more than 10 years resulted in the decrease of<br />

relative risk (RR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.3–1.0) in comparison with individuals who gave up<br />

smoking 1–4 years ago (P for trend = 0.028).<br />

Several case–control studies presented results separately for gastric cardia (or for adenocarcinoma<br />

of distal oesophagus <strong>and</strong> gastric cardia) <strong>and</strong> distal stomach (Wu-Williams<br />

et al. 1990; Kabat et al. 1993; Zhang et al. 1996; Gammond et al. 1997; De Stefani et al.<br />

1998; Ye et al. 1999; Zaridze et al. 2000; Wu et al. 2001). In all these studies effects of<br />

smoking on the risk have been seen for cancers of both sites. In some studies association<br />

was somewhat stronger for distal stomach (Wu-Williams et al. 1990; Zhang et al. 1996;<br />

Wu et al. 2001), in others with cancer of the gastric cardia (Kabat et al. 1993; Zaridze et al.<br />

2000). Dose–response relationship was observed between number of cigarettes smoked<br />

per day, duration of smoking, pack-years of smoking, age started smoking, <strong>and</strong> the risk<br />

of cancer of the gastric cardia (Zhang et al. 1996; Gammon et al. 1997; De Stefani et al.<br />

1998; Ye et al. 1999; Zaridze et al. 2000; Wu et al. 2001) <strong>and</strong> distal stomach (Gammon<br />

et al. 1997; De Stefani et al. 1998; Zheng et al. 1996; Wu et al. 2001). Case–control study<br />

from Sweden reported similar trends in relative risk of stomach cancer related to number<br />

of cigarettes smoked per day—for cancer of the distal stomach (P for trend = 0.005) <strong>and</strong><br />

gastric cardia (P for trend = 0.04), duration of smoking—for cancer of the distal stomach<br />

(P for trend = 0.002) <strong>and</strong> gastric cardia (P for trend = 0.03).<br />

Smoking cessation significantly decreased the risk of cancer of gastric cardia. In a<br />

population-based case–control study reported from Sweden which included 262 cases<br />

of cancer of gastric cardia <strong>and</strong> 820 community controls, the increase in numbers of<br />

years since smoking cessation was associated with statistically significant decrease in<br />

the risk (P for trend < 0.0001). Those individuals who gave up smoking for more than<br />

25 years had relative risk of 1.9 (95% CI 1.1–3.1), while those who quit 0–2 years ago<br />

had relative risk of 4.2 (95% CI 2.8–6.4) (Lagergren et al. 2000). Similar trend was<br />

observed by Wu et al. (2001), both for cancer of gastric cardia (P for trend < 0.0002)<br />

<strong>and</strong> cancer of the distal stomach (P for trend < 0.002).<br />

Significant association between smoking <strong>and</strong> risk persisted when relative risks were<br />

computed separately for intestinal <strong>and</strong> diffuse types of stomach cancer (Kato et al.<br />

1990; Ye et al. 1999).<br />

Number of cases of stomach cancer in women was generally small <strong>and</strong> the increases<br />

in risks associated with smoking were less than for men <strong>and</strong> statistically not significant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!