18.02.2013 Views

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary<br />

Chapter 28<br />

Smoking <strong>and</strong> lung cancer<br />

Graham G. Giles <strong>and</strong> Peter Boyle<br />

The establishment of the causal link between smoking <strong>and</strong> lung cancer was an<br />

epidemiological triumph won against considerable resistance marshalled by the tobacco<br />

industry. This chapter reviews how the evidence that smoking causes lung cancer was<br />

accumulated <strong>and</strong> weighed against criteria adopted to establish the causal significance<br />

of epidemiological associations between an exposure <strong>and</strong> disease. The history of<br />

elucidating the association between lung cancer <strong>and</strong> smoking is now fundamental to<br />

modern epidemiological thinking <strong>and</strong> practice but in the early to mid-twentieth century<br />

the science of epidemiology was new <strong>and</strong> in the making, <strong>and</strong> the research on<br />

smoking <strong>and</strong> lung cancer contributed to the development of epidemiology as a discipline<br />

(White 1990). In addition to the evaluation of epidemiological evidence, the case<br />

for causality was strengthened by evidence from human pathology <strong>and</strong> by evidence<br />

from experimental studies using animal models. Much of this material has been<br />

reviewed previously elsewhere (IARC 1986) to which the interested reader is referred<br />

for more detail than can be given here.<br />

Introduction<br />

The last century has witnessed a remarkable epidemic of lung cancer. The words of<br />

Adler (1912), today make salutatory reading. ‘Is it worthwhile to write a monograph on<br />

the subject of primary malignant tumours of the lung? In the course of the last two<br />

centuries an ever-increasing literature has accumulated around this subject. But this literature<br />

is without correlation, much of it buried in dissertations <strong>and</strong> other out-of-the-way<br />

places, <strong>and</strong>, with but a few notable exceptions, no attempt has been made to study the<br />

subject as a whole, either the pathological or the clinical aspect having been emphasised at<br />

the expense of the other, according to the special predilection of the author. On one point,<br />

however, there is nearly complete consensus of opinion, <strong>and</strong> that is that primary malignant<br />

neoplasms of the lungs are among the rarest forms of the disease. This latter opinion<br />

of the extreme rarity of primary tumours has persisted for centuries.’<br />

The lung is the principal body organ susceptible to tobacco carcinogenesis <strong>and</strong>, apart<br />

from non-melanocytic skin cancer, in many populations it has been or remains the<br />

most commonly diagnosed cancer in men <strong>and</strong> an increasingly common cancer in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!