18.02.2013 Views

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

Chapter 2<br />

The great studies of smoking <strong>and</strong><br />

disease in the twentieth century<br />

Michael J. Thun <strong>and</strong> Jane Henley<br />

Much of what is known about the harm caused by tobacco use was learned from large<br />

prospective epidemiologic studies conducted during the second half of the twentieth<br />

century in the United Kingdom <strong>and</strong> United States. To underst<strong>and</strong> why these studies<br />

were so important in documenting the deleterious effects of smoking, one must appreciate<br />

the pervasive grip that tobacco, particularly cigarette smoking, held on the United<br />

Kingdom <strong>and</strong> its former Western colonies at the close of the Second World War. The<br />

culture of cigarettes was sustained not only by nicotine addiction <strong>and</strong> by the political<br />

<strong>and</strong> economic power of the tobacco industry, but also by the symbols <strong>and</strong> imagery<br />

with which advertising had imbued it, <strong>and</strong> by prevailing social norms. How could an<br />

apparently ordinary behavior, practised by so many people with so little evidence of<br />

acute toxicity, prove to have such severe chronic effects?<br />

Sir Richard Doll, a pioneer of tobacco epidemiology, has examined the history of scientific<br />

<strong>and</strong> social factors that led ultimately to the recognition of the carcinogenicity<br />

<strong>and</strong> pathogenicity of smoking (Doll 1998b). He notes that, in retrospect, the medical<br />

evidence of the adverse health effects of tobacco accumulated for 200 years before it<br />

was generally accepted, in the late 1950s, that smoking caused lung cancer <strong>and</strong>, in the<br />

two subsequent decades, that it caused many other diseases as well (Doll 1998b).<br />

He cites three factors that contributed to the strength of resistance to the idea that<br />

smoking was a major cause of lung cancer: ‘the ubiquity of the habit, which was as<br />

entrenched among male doctors <strong>and</strong> scientists as among the rest of the adult male<br />

population <strong>and</strong> had dulled the collective sense that tobacco might be a major threat to<br />

health’, ‘the novelty of the epidemiological techniques, particularly as applied to noninfectious<br />

diseases’, <strong>and</strong> ‘the primacy given to Koch’s postulates in determining causation’,<br />

since criteria had not yet been developed to assess the causation of chronic<br />

diseases such as cancer.<br />

This chapter examines the contributions of several large prospective studies, conducted<br />

over the second half of the twentieth century, to our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

health hazards of tobacco use. The designation ‘Great Studies’ is used to refer to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!