18.02.2013 Views

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TONGZHANG ZHENG ET AL. 419<br />

For example, a case–control study by Franceschi et al. (1990) reported an OR of<br />

20.7 (95% CI 5.6–76.3) for pipe <strong>and</strong> cigar smokers compared to an OR of 11.1 (95%<br />

CI 3.4–34.8) for cigarette smokers.<br />

Zheng et al. (1990) reported an OR of 5.7 (95% CI 2.4–13.3) for male pipe smokers<br />

compared to 1.6 (95% CI 1.0–2.6) for male cigarette smokers in their case–control<br />

study. Franco et al. (1989) reported a higher risk of oral cancer for pipe smoking<br />

compared to other smoking behaviors, particularly for cancer of other parts of the<br />

mouth (ICD9 143–145).<br />

Pipe smoking also showed a strong dose-dependent relationship with oral cancer<br />

risk in several studies (Blot et al. 1988; Mashberg et al. 1993; Schlecht et al. 1999). For<br />

example, the study by Schlecht et al. (1999) reported an OR of 6.7 (95% CI 3.1–14.8)<br />

for those who smoked 1–20 pack-years of commercial-cigarette equivalents of pipe,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 8.2 (95% CI 3.7–17.8) for those with more than 20 pack-years of commercialcigarette<br />

equivalents of pipe smoking. Similarly, in a large case–control study, Blot et al.<br />

(1988) reported an OR of 1.9 (9% CI 1.1–3.4) for those exclusively smoking cigars<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or pipes, with a positive trend associated with increasing numbers of cigars/pipes<br />

smoked. The OR rose to 16.7 (95% CI 3.7–76.7) for men who smoked 40 or more<br />

cigars/week, <strong>and</strong> to 3.1 (95% CI 1.1–8.7) for those consuming 40+ pipefuls/week.<br />

However, other studies, such as Merletti et al. (1989) reported a higher risk of oral<br />

cancer for cigar smokers (OR = 14.6, 95% CI 4.7–45.6) than pipe smokers (OR = 3.8,<br />

95% CI 1.1–12.6) <strong>and</strong> than cigarette smokers (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.6–9.4) among male<br />

smokers. A strong dose–response relationship has been shown between cigar smoking<br />

<strong>and</strong> risk of oral cancer. In particular, the study by Garrote et al. (2001) showed a strong<br />

dose–response relationship between cigar smoking <strong>and</strong> oral cancer risk (P trend < 0.01).<br />

They found that, compared with never smokers, those who smoked 5 cigars per day) for oral <strong>and</strong> pharyngeal cancer risk. In a case–control study of<br />

oral <strong>and</strong> esophageal cancers involving only those who never smoked pipe tobacco or<br />

cigarettes, La Vecchia et al. (1998) reported an OR of 6.8 (95% CI 2.5–18.5) for ever<br />

smokers <strong>and</strong> 8.9 for smokers of more than 3 cigars per day, <strong>and</strong> 14.9 (95% CI 4.0–55.9)<br />

for current cigar smokers when compared to never cigar smokers.<br />

In either case, pipe <strong>and</strong> cigar smoking clearly increases the risk of oral cancer. This<br />

risk seems to vary by anatomic subsite. Shapiro et al. (2000) found that, compared with<br />

never smokers, current cigar smokers had an RR of 4.0 (95% CI 1.5–10.3) for cancer of<br />

the oral cavity/pharynx compared to 10.3 (95% CI 2.6–41.0) for cancer of the larynx.<br />

Former smokers had an OR of 2.4 (95% CI 0.8–7.3) for cancer of the oral cavity/pharynx,<br />

but 6.7 (95% CI 1.5–30.0) for cancer of the larynx. In their case–<br />

control study of oral <strong>and</strong> esophageal cancers, La Vecchia et al. (1998) reported an OR 9.0<br />

(95% CI 2.7–30.0) for oral <strong>and</strong> pharyngeal cancers, compared to 4.1 (95% CI 0.7–23.0)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!