18.02.2013 Views

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

Tobacco and Public Health - TCSC Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

418<br />

TOBACCO USE AND RISK OF ORAL CANCER<br />

Prospective follow-up studies<br />

A prospective follow-up study is conducted based on the presence or absence of<br />

exposure of investigation without the information regarding disease status. Therefore,<br />

a follow-up study is less prone to selection bias at the start of the study. However, the<br />

losses to follow-up may still pose an issue for the interpretation of the study results,<br />

especially for diseases, such as cancers, which have long induction <strong>and</strong> latency periods.<br />

Hammond <strong>and</strong> Seidman (1980) reported a prospective mortality study of over one<br />

million Americans in 1721 counties in 25 states in the US. The study reported that,<br />

among men, oral cancer mortality rates were 2.3/100 000 for those who never smoked<br />

regularly, 11.7/100000 for pipe <strong>and</strong> cigar smokers, <strong>and</strong> 15.0/100 000 for cigarette<br />

smokers. Among women, the oral cancer mortality rates were 2.0/100 000 for those<br />

who never smoked regularly <strong>and</strong> 6.5/100 000 for cigarette smokers.<br />

Another prospective cohort mortality study from Japan by Akiba <strong>and</strong> Hirayama<br />

(1990) examined the site-specific cancer risk associated with cigarette smoking, using<br />

the data from 265 000 residents of 29 public health districts in six prefectures throughout<br />

Japan. The study reported a statistically significant dose–response relationship<br />

between cigarette smoking <strong>and</strong> mortality rate for cancer of the oral cavity, larynx,<br />

esophagus, bladder, <strong>and</strong> stomach in men. Compared to never smokers, the RRs were 2.5<br />

(95% CI 1.3–5.7) for cancer of the oral cavity <strong>and</strong> 23.8 (95% CI 5.3–420.0) for cancer<br />

of the larynx among males. Very few women smoked cigarettes in this population.<br />

Chyou et al. (1995) reported a cohort study of upper aerodigestive tract cancer<br />

among 7995 Japanese–American men in Hawaii in which they examined the potential<br />

impact of smoking <strong>and</strong> other risk factors on the incidence of upper aerodigestive<br />

tract cancer (30 men with oral/pharyngeal cancer, 27 men with laryngeal cancer, <strong>and</strong><br />

35 men with esophageal cancer). The study found that current cigarette smokers at<br />

time of examination had a threefold risk for upper aerodigestive tract cancer compared<br />

with never-smokers (RR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.7–5.9). A significant positive linear trend in<br />

relative risk was observed in number of cigarettes smoked per day (Ptrend = 0.002), <strong>and</strong><br />

number of years of smoking (Ptrend = 0.0006).<br />

Pipe <strong>and</strong> cigar smoking<br />

Another major source of exposure to tobacco is through cigar <strong>and</strong> pipe smoking.<br />

Similar to the observations for cigarettes smoking <strong>and</strong> oral cancer risk, the vast majority<br />

of studies have identified a strong association between cigar <strong>and</strong> pipe smoking <strong>and</strong> oral<br />

cancer risk (Blot et al. 1988; Spitz et al. 1988; Franco et al. 1989; Merletti et al. 1989;<br />

Franceschi et al. 1990; La Vecchia et al. 1990, 1998; Zheng et al. 1990; Mashberg et al.<br />

1993; Schildt et al. 1998; Hayes et al. 1999; Schlecht et al. 1999; Shapiro et al. 2000;<br />

Garrote et al. 2001). With only a few studies, such as the study by Marshall et al. (1992),<br />

reporting little or no association. In some studies, the risk of oral cancer was actually<br />

found to be higher for pipe <strong>and</strong> cigar smokers than for cigarette smokers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!