23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.18<br />

A listing <strong>of</strong> all accidents considered in this analysis and the grouping <strong>of</strong> releases to<br />

determine source terms for environmental consequence analysis is given in Section 3.7 <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology for Commercial <strong>Radioactive</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (DOE/ET-0028). Environmental impacts<br />

<strong>of</strong> specific source terms are presented in the Environmental Aspects <strong>of</strong> Commercial Radio-<br />

active <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (DOE/ET-0029).<br />

Each waste management technology was examined for potential accidents which might<br />

result in <strong>of</strong>fsite releases or significant impact on plant operations. Potential hazardous<br />

material releases (called source terms) were developed for these accidents using successive<br />

release fractions. The release fraction is the fraction <strong>of</strong> radionuclide inventory that is<br />

released to the next containment barrier or to the environment. The radioactivity released<br />

in an accident may be substantially reduced by one or more barriers, such as high-efficiency<br />

particulate air (HEPA) filter banks. The radioactivity released to the environment was<br />

obtained by multiplying the product <strong>of</strong> the release fraction for each release mechanism and<br />

containment barrier (e.g., the accident, process equipment, HEPA filters, etc.) by the<br />

radionuclide inventories involved in the operation. Where more than one waste management<br />

technique was examined, analysis was based on the example system waste form (see figure<br />

4.1.3 on page 4.8 for the identification <strong>of</strong> the example waste forms).<br />

Accident frequency estimates were developed where possible. In the absence <strong>of</strong> actual<br />

accident experience estimates are based on previous experience with similar equipment, while<br />

others are engineering judgment based on review <strong>of</strong> the conceptual designs.<br />

Following source term and frequency definition, the lists <strong>of</strong> representative accident<br />

scenarios were classified into three accident severity groups:<br />

1. Minor--Process interruptions without potential for significant release <strong>of</strong> radio-<br />

active or other hazardous materials.<br />

2. Moderate--Events with potential for small radioactivity release.<br />

3. Severe--Events with a potential for significant radiation hazards.<br />

The three accident classifications cover the spectrum <strong>of</strong> design-basis accidents. Non-<br />

design-basis accidents (a fourth category) includes all accidents which exceed site crite-<br />

ria(a) (e.g., meteorite impact) or involve concurrent independent failure <strong>of</strong> process and<br />

multiple containment system barriers. By virtue <strong>of</strong> plant design and operational techniques,<br />

the possibility <strong>of</strong> nondesign-basis accidents is extremely unlikely during the design life<br />

<strong>of</strong> the waste treatment or storage facility and are not considered for these facilities.<br />

However, for geologic isolation, because <strong>of</strong> the long period <strong>of</strong> required containment, sev-<br />

eral nondesign-basis accidents (or unexpected events) are postulated (Section 5.5).<br />

An umbrella source term concept was used to limit the number <strong>of</strong> accidents requiring<br />

detailed impact analysis. Viewed independently <strong>of</strong> accident initiation sequences and fre-<br />

(a) Site criteria include: 1) definition <strong>of</strong> the maximum credible earthquake, surface faulting,<br />

floods and wind velocities based on historical evidence, local and regional<br />

geology, and expert judgment; 2) local and regional demography; and 3) proximity and<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> hazards caused by man.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!