23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.22<br />

startup. This is because <strong>of</strong> the declining schedule <strong>of</strong> fuel discharges (see Figure 3.2.3)<br />

and the accelerated repository receiving rate used to eliminate the storage backlog (see<br />

Figure 7.3.4). For Cases 4 and 5 under the proposed program, the repository starts the same<br />

year as reprocessing and there are no interim storage requirements. However, under the<br />

alternative program the storage requirements are substantial for these cases.<br />

7.3.3 Transportation Requirements<br />

Transportation requirements are identified here in terms <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> shipments<br />

required. A shipment is defined as one truck cask or one rail or intermodal cask shipment<br />

in the case <strong>of</strong> spent fuel or one truck load or one rail car in the case <strong>of</strong> reprocessing<br />

wastes.<br />

Transportation requirements for the once-through cycle are shown in Table 7.3.5. Truck<br />

shipments are the same under the proposed program or the alternative program. This is<br />

because it does not matter whether the fuel shipped from the reactor by truck goes to<br />

interim storage or the repository. It is only shipped once by truck as shipments from<br />

interim storage are assumed to be entirely by rail. Rail shipments can be higher under the<br />

alternative program because storage requirements are higher and any fuel shipped to interim<br />

storage must be shipped twice--once from the reactor to interim storage and once from<br />

interim storage to the repository. Fewer shipments are required under the no-action alter-<br />

native because some <strong>of</strong> the fuel remains in the reactor basins and is not shipped at all.<br />

Additional details are shown in Appendix A, Table A.7.1.<br />

Transportation requirements for the reprocessing cycle are shown in Table 7.3.6.<br />

Transportation requirements range somewhat higher under the alternative program than under<br />

the proposed program because more shipments are required to interim storage as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

TABLE 7.3.5. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Transportation Requirements for the Program Alternative Using<br />

the Once-Through Fuel Cycle<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Spent Fuel Shipments<br />

Proposed Program Alternative Program<br />

Nuclear Power Growth Transport (Geologic Disposal (Disposal Starting No Action<br />

Case Assumption Mode Starting 1990 - 2010) 2010 - 2030) Alternative<br />

1 Present Inventory Rail 2,300 2,300 0<br />

Only Truck 2,300 2,300 0<br />

2 Present Capacity Rail 13,300 to 18,000 18,000 to 19,000 8,400<br />

Normal Life Truck 11,000 11,000 8,600<br />

3 250 GWe by Year Rail 61,000 to 89,000 89,000 to 96,000 45,000<br />

2000 and Steady Truck 56,000 56,000 46,000<br />

State<br />

4 250 GWe System by Rail 97,000 127,000 NA(a)<br />

Year 2000 and Truck 73,000 73,000 NA<br />

Steady State<br />

5 500 GWe by Year Rail 126,000 170,000 NA<br />

2040 Truck 99,000 99,000 NA<br />

(a) NA = not applicable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!