23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

N.3<br />

operation used to separate the fuel from the structural material. In this amount a system<br />

might be required to remove 14 C from the reprocessing facility <strong>of</strong>f-gas stream.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> high radioactivities, the isotopes 232 U and 228 Th incidentally generated in<br />

the 232U-thorium cycle pose some short-term handling problems not significantly present with<br />

the SEU system. Uranium-232 has a 70-year half-life followed by much shorter half-lived<br />

daughters leading to 208 T1, which has a 2.6 MeV gamma. In the recycle case, this compli-<br />

cates the handling <strong>of</strong> 233 U fuels even though it is present in only a few parts per million.<br />

However, as a diluent in uranium, it does not appreciably complicate waste storage. A long-<br />

term concern may be the precursor <strong>of</strong> 232 U, namely 231Pa. The concentration in the wastes<br />

<strong>of</strong> 23 1 Pa with its 32,500-year half-life will depend on how it is managed in the successive<br />

recycle. There is, <strong>of</strong> course, an incentive to hold the protactinium in a processing vessel<br />

to assure that the 233 Pa fully decays to 233 U, which is then bled <strong>of</strong>f and recycled. Under<br />

these circumstances there is no reason to recycle protactinium and thus 23 1 Pa is not "burned<br />

out." Its concentration in the wastes is correspondingly increased to levels that may<br />

approach the 23 9 Pu concentration in wastes from plutonium recycle. This could be allevi-<br />

ated by purposefully irradiating 23 1 Pa as an isolated target and by adding the 232U gener-<br />

ated into the high-level wastes in dilutions so localized heating will not be produced.<br />

Currently it is believed necessary to add fluorine to dissolve spent thorium oxide<br />

fuel. The effects <strong>of</strong> fluorine, if any, upon the waste processing are unknown. However,<br />

steps could be taken to obviate the fluorine in the processing. This may involve addition<br />

<strong>of</strong> magnesium, calcium, or other elements to thorium oxide which will add to waste volume,<br />

but not appreciably to radioactivity. This may, however, increase the solubility <strong>of</strong><br />

thorium dioxide in water coolant streams, increasing contamination <strong>of</strong> water coolant streams<br />

if fuel jackets develop leaks.<br />

It is not believed that fluorine will detract from the qualities <strong>of</strong> the waste glass as<br />

fluoride is a constituent <strong>of</strong> many commercial glasses and enamels. The fluorine content <strong>of</strong><br />

commercial glasses rarely exceeds 6%. Fluoride at those high concentrations acts as an opacifier<br />

in the glass owing to dispersed fluoride crystals. considerable laboratory experimentation<br />

has already been done on the incorporation <strong>of</strong> fluoride in nuclear waste glass.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!