23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.95<br />

identify at this time, such as siting and engineering scope requirements necessary to pro-<br />

vide a fully functional facility. Also included in the estimates are the possible variances<br />

<strong>of</strong> the assumed rock densities used in the development <strong>of</strong> mining costs. The contingency<br />

factors are such that, within the stated accuracy range, there is an approximately equal<br />

likelihood <strong>of</strong> the indicated cost overrun or underrun. The construction cost estimation<br />

methodology is explained in more detail in DOE/ET-0028, Vol. 1, Section 3.8.<br />

Construction costs for repositories in different media are based on a fixed repository<br />

area <strong>of</strong> 800 ha (2000 acres). However, since waste emplacement density is a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

thermal characteristics <strong>of</strong> each type <strong>of</strong> media, actual waste quantities emplaced differ for<br />

each 800 ha repository. Table 5.6.1 shows equivalent waste quantities emplaced, the resul-<br />

tant mining requirements and the construction costs. Operating costs and unit costs are<br />

also given in this table to facilitate comparisons <strong>of</strong> cost relationships. These costs are<br />

discussed in subsequent sections.<br />

Since mining costs account for 30% to 50% <strong>of</strong> total construction costs, the total con-<br />

struction costs vary significantly between geologic media. However, emplacement capacity<br />

increases for media with higher mining costs (see Section 5.3) and the relative unit cost<br />

differences between geologic media are smaller than the relative construction cost differ-<br />

ences. For example, construction costs for an 800-ha repository in basalt are about three<br />

times those <strong>of</strong> an 800-ha repository in salt for the once-through cycle, but the cost per<br />

TABLE 5.6.1. Cost Estimates for 800-hectare Geologic Repositories<br />

Mined Construc-) Total Unit<br />

Geologic Quantiy Equivalent MTHM tion Cost(a) Operating Cost(b) Cost(c)<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> Type Media 106 MT <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> Emplaced Millions <strong>of</strong> $ Millions <strong>of</strong> $ $/kg HM(e)<br />

Spent Fuel Salt 30 51,000 1,000 590 52<br />

Granite 77 121,600 2,600 2,350 78<br />

Shale 35 64,500 1,300 810 57<br />

Basalt 90 121,600 3,100 2,390 87<br />

HLW(d) TRU(d)<br />

Reprocessing<br />

Cycle <strong>Waste</strong>s Salt 35 62,000 100,000 1,200 1,210 47<br />

Granite 53 69,000 108,000 2,000 1,940 77<br />

Shale 30 30,500 56,000 1,300 830 73<br />

Basalt 59 56,000 92,000 2,300 1,740 93<br />

(a) Includes mining, backfilling and shaft sealing costs. Backfilling and shaft sealing costs are<br />

approximately 10% <strong>of</strong> total construction costs. Uncertainties in construction cost estimates<br />

are about +20%.<br />

(b) UncertaintTes in operating cost estimates are about +25%.<br />

(c) Includes decommissioning costs. Uncertainties in unTt cost estimates are about +50%.<br />

(d) The metric ton <strong>of</strong> heavy metal (MTHM) equivalent <strong>of</strong> high-level waste stored at the initial<br />

repository is less than the MTHM equivalent <strong>of</strong> TRU wastes since the high-level waste must be<br />

cooled 5 years before it can be sent to the repository and deliveries to the repository lag<br />

behind TRU waste deliveries.<br />

(e) Costs may be expressed in $/GW-yr by multiplying by 38,000 KgHM/GW-yr.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!