23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

as storage facilities begin to reach their capacity. We would urge you :, for our gragile ecology.<br />

seek input from local and state governments as well as ordinary citizens in In addition, Louisiana has experienced a number <strong>of</strong> environmental problems<br />

a more aggressive manner by holding hearings in the specific areas that -re being in the past several years. The ONWI report ignores some <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />

considered and by seeking out the advice <strong>of</strong> a broad range <strong>of</strong> local and s:ate environmental and economic issues concerning our citizens. It makes no<br />

*<strong>of</strong>ficials. Holding hearings in Atlanta, Washington, New York, or Dallas just mention <strong>of</strong> the fact that Louisiana has been the dumping ground <strong>of</strong> the nation<br />

simply does not allow input by the people most affected. We hope that 7:- for hazardous waste. Louisiana is the first state in the nation to implement a<br />

will then reflect on the advice you will receive and give equal weight to the strict hazardous waste permitting program. During the past year, we discovered<br />

advice <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong>ficials as well as federal. that there are numerous illegal and in some cases abandoned chemical waste<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong>-storage medium or technology used, the most dumps across the state. The clean up <strong>of</strong> the abandoned facilities will be<br />

difficult issue to resolve will be the siting <strong>of</strong> each facility. Although a financial burden for our state. It is expected that we will have to deal<br />

this EIS does not address specifically each site under consideration, we with this environmental problem for quite some time before we finally get it<br />

have seen the ONWI summary characterization and recommendatipn <strong>of</strong> study under control.<br />

areas for the Gulf Interior Region issued in May, 1979, and we realize that Our waterways are experiencing the stress <strong>of</strong> our economic growth and<br />

there are two salt domes in Louisiana under consideration by DOE. <strong>of</strong> our agricultural production. In north Louisiana we have had serious problems<br />

Although we can't claim expertise in the various scientific disciplines with pesticide contamination <strong>of</strong> our lakes, rivers and streams. In both north<br />

which are discussed in the EIS, we do have expertise in the assessment <strong>of</strong> and south Louisiana we have areas that are non-attainment for certain air<br />

Louisiana's political, economjc, and psychological environment. In considering pollutants.<br />

the site <strong>of</strong> a repository, more must be considered than the geologic or surface In north Louisiana, we have recently discovered that we have millions <strong>of</strong><br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> the area involved. The decision makers must consider the political, tons <strong>of</strong> lignite coal deposits which we will soon be mining. We will undertake<br />

ecocomic, and psychological effects <strong>of</strong> their actions. We would urge that when a program to allow surface mining along with reclamation programs to follow<br />

specific sites are under consideration that informed local and state <strong>of</strong>ficials so that we can make this coal available as a fuel for our industries. The production<br />

must be a part <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> choosing a site or <strong>of</strong> determining that a site <strong>of</strong> coal will mean greater industrial development and expansion all across that<br />

is inappropriate. In the past, most decisions made by DOE and other federal area <strong>of</strong> our state with both power plants and other support facilities expected<br />

agencies involving our state have not allowed sufficient local input and that to be constructed close to the mining area.<br />

is probably one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons that many <strong>of</strong> these programs have run into We are a state <strong>of</strong> approximately 4,000.000 people living on 48,506 square<br />

trouble. A prime example is the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Program in which miles <strong>of</strong> land and water. This means there are more than 81.8 people per square<br />

the DOE has taken several <strong>of</strong> our salt domes and converted them to oil storage mile. In Webster Parish where the Vacherie dome is located there are 42,068<br />

facilites. In their haste to get this program under way, they have ignored people living on 620 square miles or 67.9 people per square mile. In Bienville<br />

citizens and their elected representatives and :i.ve ignored concern<br />

3 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!