23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.83<br />

containers are given in Table 4.7.6. These resource commitments are small in comparison<br />

with those <strong>of</strong> the FRP and MOX-FFP production facilities and in an absolute sense are not<br />

expected to have a significant impact on available supplies <strong>of</strong> these materials or energy<br />

sources. Energy and materials required for decommissioning do not add significantly to<br />

the quantities <strong>of</strong> resources required for construction.<br />

4.7.2.2 Nonradiological Effluents <strong>of</strong> Reprocessing Fuel Cycle <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

Nonradioactive pollutants released to the atmosphere during construction <strong>of</strong> the FRP and<br />

MOX-FFP waste management facilities and the RWSF result from the combustion <strong>of</strong> fuel in con-<br />

struction vehicles and machinery, fugitive dust from ground-clearing operations, and parti-<br />

culates from concrete batch operations.<br />

Offsite concentrations <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and particulates resulting<br />

from construction force traffic and construction equipment emissions are projected to be<br />

less than Federal ambient air quality standards. (Onsite concentrations <strong>of</strong> particulates at<br />

the FRP and MOX-FFP construction sites were found to exceed the air quality standards; this<br />

will occur primarily as a result <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> FRP and MOX-FFP production facilities<br />

and is a normal situation at sites <strong>of</strong> heavy construction.) Evaluation <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and<br />

nitrogen oxide emissions indicates no significant effects.<br />

The release <strong>of</strong> about 1 x 109 MJ <strong>of</strong> waste heat per year from the example FRP waste man-<br />

agement facilities is comparable to the release <strong>of</strong> heat from a small city or town<br />

(30,000 persons) and is not expected to produce any significant effect on the environment.<br />

Predicted concentrations <strong>of</strong> pollutants in air from waste management operations will be<br />

a small fraction <strong>of</strong> Federal air quality standards, threshold limit value concentrations<br />

TABLE 4.7.6. Resource Commitments for Construction and Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> Shipping Containers<br />

Material Used in<br />

Construction, MT/cask Diesel Fuel Used per<br />

Shipping Container Example Capacity Stainless Steel Lead Shipment, m /km<br />

High-level waste Solidified HLW 25 75 0.0020<br />

cask from 27 MTHM<br />

Fuel residue cask 3 fuel residue 16 49 0.0013<br />

canisters (residue<br />

from 12 MTHM)<br />

6-drum cask Six 55-gal drums 4 15<br />

14-drum cask Fourteen 55-gal 5 14<br />

drums<br />

Shielded overpack Thirty-six 55-gal 7 12<br />

drums<br />

Unshielded overpack Thirty-six 55-gal 7 0 0.0010<br />

drums (or equivalent<br />

volume <strong>of</strong><br />

boxes)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!