23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.37<br />

are identical with those used for the risk analysis <strong>of</strong> other geologic waste disposal concepts<br />

with the exception <strong>of</strong> possible bulk migration <strong>of</strong> the molten mass during the interim phase<br />

between cavity sealing and solidification.<br />

Ground Water Migration and Rock Melting. While a molten or high-temperature rock mass<br />

would disrupt natural patterns <strong>of</strong> water movement in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> a repository, the rela-<br />

tive effect would diminish with distance, until, at some point, the repository would have no<br />

appreciable effect on water transport <strong>of</strong> radioactive materials. Presumably, if the hydrology<br />

<strong>of</strong> the repository area were well characterized, its effects could be modeled by treating it<br />

as a roughly spherical barrier with a radius that shrinks as the waste-rock matrix cools.<br />

Preliminary work on a laboratory scale and at atmospheric pressure indicates that this "ther-<br />

mal barrier" effect (Taylor 1977) could be demonstrated experimentally; however, additional<br />

work that more closely simulates conditions expected at the repository depth would be<br />

required.<br />

Technological Issues<br />

The technological issues that would require resolution before initiation <strong>of</strong> the rock<br />

melting concept can be summarized as follows:<br />

* The necessary geological information cannot be predicted with present knowledge.<br />

* Empirical data on the waste/rock interaction and characteristics are lacking.<br />

* No technical or engineering work design <strong>of</strong> the required facilities has been attempted.<br />

It is not possible at this time to produce a design for the rock melt repository because the<br />

necessary information is lacking. Data on the form and properties <strong>of</strong> the waste to be charged<br />

into the cavity, the charging methodology, the properties <strong>of</strong> the host rock, and many techni-<br />

cal aspects <strong>of</strong> the shaft sinking method and cavity construction technique would have to be<br />

resolved. For many <strong>of</strong> these operations, work could not begin until fundamental waste/rock<br />

properties are better known.<br />

In addition, the concept would require operations and process activities that do not re-<br />

adily lend themselves to the same degree <strong>of</strong> conservatism normally utilized in the nuclear<br />

field. Discussed below are several areas that would require further scientific or technical<br />

work.<br />

Cavity Design and Construction. The greatest problem might lie in the construction <strong>of</strong><br />

the cavity. Although, it is within the bounds <strong>of</strong> current technology to lower men and equip-<br />

ment through a 2-m-diameter shaft and construct the required cavity, such operations are dif-<br />

ficult and time consuming. Methods for lining the cavity may have to be developed. Further-<br />

more, it is practically impossible to construct the cavity without cracking the surrounding<br />

rock. Since it may be necessary to maintain the waste inside the cavity for some years<br />

before rock melting is permitted to begin, it would be necessary to ensure that waste does<br />

not escape into the cracks and ultimately into ground water. It may be difficult to assure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!