23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P.3 MINERAL TABLES<br />

P.35<br />

P.3.1 Hosts for Radionuclides<br />

Table P.3.1 lists selected minerals which have potential as hosts for radionuclides.<br />

The entries in Table P.3.1 were selected according to the criteria listed below.<br />

Approximately 2500 mineral species have been identified. These have been compiled into<br />

reference sources <strong>of</strong> which those <strong>of</strong> the Dana system (Palache et al. 1944, 1951), Deer, Howie<br />

and Zussman (1962), Strunz (1970), and Roberts, Rapp and Weber (1974) were consulted. Each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 2500 minerals was reviewed and in a first sieving all minerals that were known to be<br />

water-soluble, chemically undesirable or crystal-chemically unsuitable as radionuclide hosts<br />

were eliminated. A much shortened list <strong>of</strong> about 100 minerals remained. A second sieving<br />

eliminated minerals <strong>of</strong> great chemical complexity that would be difficult to synthesize. The<br />

minerals that remained were separated according to the radionuclide for which they were to<br />

serve as host and these groups were then roughly ranked with the best candidates listed<br />

first.<br />

Table P.3.2 is the final listing. In addition to mineral name and formula, the table<br />

lists some available information <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> these minerals in nature, which pro-<br />

vides clues to their stability in the repository environment, and on alteration processes<br />

where known, it must be emphasized that the data on these later categories are very sparse<br />

although this study does not claim to be an exhaustive literature survey. Table P.3.2 is<br />

intended as a guide for future research rather than finalized data for engineering design.<br />

P.3.2 Commentary on Table P.3.1<br />

The lack <strong>of</strong> silicate minerals on the listing is perhaps unexpected. Silicates make up<br />

the bulk <strong>of</strong> the rocks on the earth and many <strong>of</strong> them are very stable. However, the common<br />

silicate structures utilize the most abundant elements <strong>of</strong> the earth and the critical radio-<br />

nuclides from nuclear waste are, with the exception <strong>of</strong> 90 Sr, unusual elements, either too<br />

large or too small to fit into available sites in the silicate minerals. Furthermore,<br />

silicates are relatively less resistant to weathering and only a few, or which zircon is an<br />

outstanding example, survive the weathering process to become detrital minerals. Even fewer<br />

survive to become placer minerals.<br />

Phosphates and oxides are the first and second most stable minerals in a wide variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> geochemical environments from initial formation at high temperatures and pressures,<br />

through weathering transport, contact with salt water in oceanic depositional basins,<br />

burial, diagenesis, upheaval, and in some cases a complete second cycle <strong>of</strong> weathering.<br />

A very large number <strong>of</strong> phases on the list occur in pegmatites or in alkaline rocks that<br />

are closely related. The minerals, by implication, are stable in the presence <strong>of</strong> aqueous<br />

solutions at temperatures to 600'C and pressures to several kilobars. Chemical compatibility<br />

with granite rocks is implied. Whether many <strong>of</strong> these minerals are compatible with other can-<br />

didate repository rocks, basalts, and shales require research. The fact that the minerals<br />

do not occur in these rocks in nature means only that the chemistry for their formation was<br />

not correct, not that the minerals are necessarily incompatible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!