23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

5 200<br />

-_J<br />

100 -<br />

3.13<br />

CASE S<br />

S/ CASE4<br />

| 1 ^ CASE 3<br />

CASE2<br />

0<br />

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040<br />

FIGURE 3.2.3. Nuclear Power Growth Assumptions<br />

Case 1--Present Inventory--This case considers the requirements for management <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 10,000 MTHM <strong>of</strong> spent fuel that would remain if the 50 GWe <strong>of</strong> LWR capacity<br />

operating at the beginning <strong>of</strong> 1980 were shut down at the end <strong>of</strong> 1980 and all reactor cores<br />

discharged. However, no attempt is made in this Statement to consider or evaluate the<br />

broader issues <strong>of</strong> an industry shutdown (beyond those associated with handling the waste)<br />

such as national energy policy, impact on the economy, the impacts <strong>of</strong> alternative energy<br />

sources, costs, and the environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> such action.<br />

Case 2--Present Capacity--This case considers the requirements for management <strong>of</strong><br />

48,000 MTHM <strong>of</strong> spent fuel that would result from continued operation <strong>of</strong> the existing 50 GWe<br />

<strong>of</strong> nuclear capacity to retirement after 40 years <strong>of</strong> operation with no further additions to<br />

this system. As in Case 1, no attempt is made to consider or evaluate the broader issues<br />

beyond the impact <strong>of</strong> handling the associated wastes, that would be involved in a limitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> this sort.<br />

Case 3--250 GWe in Year 2000 and Phaseout--Case 3 assesses the waste management impacts<br />

for all aspects <strong>of</strong> a complete life cycle <strong>of</strong> a nuclear generating system including reactor<br />

shutdown, facility decommissioning, etc. In this case nuclear power capacity increases to<br />

250 GWe in the year 2000. (This case follows the EIA high case projection through 1995.)<br />

After the year 2000, no additional nuclear power plant startups are considered. All nuclear<br />

power plants are assumed to operate for a 40-year life, after which they are decommissioned.<br />

Thus, the installed generating capacity <strong>of</strong> the system is reduced to zero in the year 2040.<br />

Based on average experience to date, average startup capacity factors <strong>of</strong> 59%, 63%, and 67%<br />

were assumed for the first three years <strong>of</strong> operation for all nuclear plants. Starting with<br />

the fourth year, each plant was assumed to operate at 70% for 22 years and then decline to<br />

40% in its fortieth year after which it is shut down. A total <strong>of</strong> 239,000 MTHM <strong>of</strong> spent fuel<br />

is produced in this case.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!