23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Response<br />

77<br />

CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS<br />

There are "astroblemes" (any scar on the surface <strong>of</strong> the earth caused by the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

cosmic body) that have been recorded in Canada and elsewhere that suggest breach by such a<br />

mechanism is possible, although very unlikely. The meteorite scenario does serve as an<br />

upper bound for the kind <strong>of</strong> improbable events required to compromise repository containment<br />

and disperse radioactive material over large areas. Damage caused by a meteorite strike to<br />

the surrounding environment (e.g.,nonradiological) are mentioned in the text as being<br />

severe, but no elaborations were made.<br />

Draft pp. 3.1.120-123<br />

Issue<br />

The discussion in GEIS under "routine releases <strong>of</strong> radioactive materials" does not<br />

address the problem <strong>of</strong> radionuclide contamination <strong>of</strong> ground water and run-<strong>of</strong>f water. This<br />

could happen as a result <strong>of</strong> accidents, clean-up operations in storage rooms, decontamination<br />

operations during the retrieval cycle, etc.<br />

In the section titled "Ecological Effects" seepage and water inflow from overlying<br />

strata for repositories in granite and in shale are discussed. The estimated inflow <strong>of</strong><br />

water in a granite repository ranges from 550 to 1550 m3/day. The estimated maximum<br />

inflow during the last stages <strong>of</strong> operation in shale will range from about 3,800 to 19,000<br />

m3/day (50,000 gpd) (sic). There appear to be two implications by omission from the<br />

discussion:<br />

* No continued water inflow is expected in the repositories in granite and in shale after<br />

the'last stage <strong>of</strong> operation.<br />

* No water inflow is expected in the repositories in salt and in basalt.<br />

The generic stratigraphy for salt includes possible aquifers overlying the salt bed.<br />

An area <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art technology is whether the effects <strong>of</strong> mining a<br />

repository in salt and <strong>of</strong> the thermal loading are such as to create fractures that would<br />

connect the aquifer bed to the repository. TM-36/21 (p. C-1) discounts this in assuming<br />

that the permeability for salt remains at zero. No justification is provided. (208-NRC)<br />

Response<br />

With respect to groundwater migration <strong>of</strong> radionucl.ides, the impact <strong>of</strong> operational<br />

accidents and normal procedures is negligible compared to the overall repository inventory.<br />

The assumptions are that no flow will occur in any repository after final stage. The.pur-<br />

pose <strong>of</strong> the Statement is to address the impact if flow does occur after the final stage.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!