23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.13<br />

Selection Plan. The current plan, described elsewhere (DOE 1980c), will be followed pending<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> a formal plan. An EA is being prepared as input to the decision on whether to<br />

adopt or modify this plan.<br />

The proposed plan includes:<br />

* The methodology for identifying geographic regions for site studies.<br />

* The methodology and criteria for screening these regions for areas, locations, and<br />

candidate sites to be studied in detail.<br />

The environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the methodology and criteria in the proposed plan and<br />

their reasonable alternatives will be assessed. In addition, the selection <strong>of</strong> areas for<br />

further study and the anticipated range <strong>of</strong> site characterization activities, including the<br />

environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> typical surface and subsurface activities in several environmental<br />

settings, will be analyzed. Similarly, the criteria proposed to be used to qualify and dis-<br />

qualify sites will be discussed.<br />

It is believed that an EA, and not an EIS, is the appropriate level <strong>of</strong> NEPA review,<br />

since it is unclear that the decision will result in significant environmental impacts.<br />

However, upon completion <strong>of</strong> the EA, a decision will be made regarding the need to prepare<br />

an EIS. The Department <strong>of</strong> Energy will consider the results <strong>of</strong> the NEPA review prior to<br />

deciding whether to adopt or modify the proposed plan. The adopted site characterization<br />

process will be repeated in diverse geologic environments and different host media until<br />

four to five sites have been qualified.<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> Locations<br />

Following completion <strong>of</strong> area studies for a particular region, in accordance with the<br />

National Plan, an EA will be prepared as input for a decision to narrow the investigations<br />

to a limited number <strong>of</strong> locations. The site-selection process to date will be described, and<br />

the environmental factors pertinent to the proposal to limit more comprehensive exploratory<br />

activities to the preferred locations will be analyzed. A comparison <strong>of</strong> environmental fac-<br />

tors for preferred and alternate locations, based on data commensurate with the level <strong>of</strong><br />

site-specific information available, will be provided and the environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

range <strong>of</strong> potential exploratory activities anticipated in the location studies will be<br />

considered.<br />

Here, too, it is believed that an EA is the appropriate level <strong>of</strong> NEPA review, since it<br />

is unclear that this decision will have environmental significance. Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

EA, a decision will be made regarding the need to prepare an EIS.<br />

Identifying Preferred Sites for Banking/Early Shaft<br />

At the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the location studies, the DOE will propose one or more <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sites in a location as a preferred site to be banked. Because a banked site ultimately may<br />

become the location <strong>of</strong> a repository, it is appropriate to prepare an EIS prior to the deci-<br />

sion to bank the preferred site(s). This EIS also would provide input to a decision to<br />

acquire an interest in the site(s), if necessary, in order to maintain the integrity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

site through the site-selection process.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!