23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Timing<br />

6.183<br />

The timing <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> a waste management system could potentially affect the<br />

feasibility <strong>of</strong> the concepts because <strong>of</strong> declining decay heat generation rates or by the<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> facilities required to implement the concept. Substantial reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

decay heat rates prior to emplacement <strong>of</strong> spent fuel or high-level waste could conceivably<br />

affect the operation <strong>of</strong> the rock melt and the ice sheet concepts; however reduction in decay<br />

heat rates over the time frames being considered for deferred fuel cycles do not appear to<br />

be great enough to materially affect operation <strong>of</strong> either <strong>of</strong> these concepts. Postponement<br />

<strong>of</strong> waste disposal operations beyond the period when light water power reactors were the<br />

dominant commercial type could impact the transmutation concept by requiring alternative<br />

transmutation devices. However, alternative devices, including fast breeder fission<br />

reactors and fusion devices, may be available and probably superior to light water reactors<br />

(Cr<strong>of</strong>f et al. 1980). Thus it is not felt that any concept can be dismissed on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

timing alone.<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> Fuel Cycle Issues<br />

In summary, it appears that all <strong>of</strong> the concepts <strong>of</strong>fer some potential benefit with any<br />

fuel cycle and that none should be dismissed because <strong>of</strong> sensitivity to fuel cycle issues<br />

(although the case for transmutation with a once-through fuel cycle appears to be quite mar-<br />

ginal). Pursuit <strong>of</strong> the rock melt, well injection, transmutation or space disposal concepts<br />

with either fuel cycle would require concurrent development <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the concepts capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> disposing <strong>of</strong> TRU waste, probably a mined repository.<br />

6.2.3.9 Concepts Should Be Independent <strong>of</strong> Reactor Design Issues<br />

None <strong>of</strong> the concepts appear to be especially sensitive to reactor design issues.<br />

6.2.3.10 Implementation <strong>of</strong> a Concept Should Allow Ability to Correct or Mitigate Failure<br />

This standard tends to favor those concepts in which wastes may be readily retrieved<br />

if observations <strong>of</strong> their actual behavior under full-scale implementation reveal previously<br />

unanticipated defects in the disposal system. Mined geologic disposal lends itself most<br />

readily to this requirement although obviously attempts at transmutation could easily be<br />

abandoned if large-scale operations failed to work.<br />

Those concepts in which retrieval from a large-scale sy:.tem would be difficult or<br />

impossible fail to meet this requirement. These concepts include space disposal, rock<br />

melt, well injection, and under certain circumstances, ice sheet disposal.<br />

6.2.3.11 Maintenance or Surveillance Should Not Be Required for Extended Periods Following<br />

Termination <strong>of</strong> Active Repository Operations<br />

The resolidification period <strong>of</strong> 1,000 years required <strong>of</strong> the rock melt concept would<br />

appear to require surveillance for a substantial period to verify long-term stability and<br />

satisfactory containment <strong>of</strong> the molten mass. This is seen as sufficiently contrary to this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!