23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56<br />

RADIOLOGICAL ISSUES<br />

The EPA risk for thyroid listed in Table E.1, 25 thyroid cancer death/106 personrem,<br />

is referenced to EPA 520/4-76-017 (Reference 6, draft Appendix G). That risk estimate can-<br />

not be found in the cited.reference. However, on p. 96, ibid., it states"..., a population<br />

age weighted value <strong>of</strong> 60 thyroid cancers per million rems to the thyroid was used." A sim-<br />

ilar risk estimate is shown in Tables 45 and 46 <strong>of</strong> EPA report 520/9-73-003-C, Environmental<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Uranium Fuel Cycle. Part II--Nuclear Power Reactors, 1973. Note that these<br />

thyroid risk estimates refer to cases, not fatalities, and so do not fit into Table E.1<br />

(113-EPA)<br />

Response<br />

In-this comment the EPA notes certain qualifications on its risk factors as quoted in<br />

draft Table E.1 (p. E.4). The only substantive comment related to the value for the thyroid<br />

risk factor, which, as the EPA correctly observes, does not appear in the reference given.<br />

The number included in draft Table E.1 represented an attempt to translate the EPA "case<br />

estimate" as given in the quoted reference, to a "fatality estimate". In retrospect this-<br />

seems ill-advised and the thyroid risk factor has been deleted, since EPA has not given such<br />

a factor in terms <strong>of</strong> fatal cancers.<br />

Draft p. E.7 and p. E.8, Table E.3<br />

Issue<br />

Newcombe's estimate <strong>of</strong> ten genetic effects based on a normal incidence rate <strong>of</strong> 0.1% for<br />

autosomal/dominant disorders has not been supported by other studies. Current incidence<br />

estimates are about 1% autosomal dominant and X-linked disorders, the estimate in<br />

UNSCEAR 1977. (113-EPA)<br />

Response<br />

The genetic effects estimates attributed to the BEIR report and EPA in draft Table E.3<br />

are not comparable to those given in the 1977 UNSCEAR report since they assume a 30-yr<br />

reproductive generation time. To compare the BEIR and EPA estimates with those <strong>of</strong> UNSCEAR,<br />

the BEIR and EPA estimates should be multiplied by a factor <strong>of</strong> about 0.6 to adjust for a<br />

30-yr population generation versus the current, approximately, 50-yr population generation.<br />

More recent EPA estimates have been adjusted for the current population generation (Feldmenn<br />

1976), to yield 200 genetic effects, close to the UNSCEAR 1977 estimate.<br />

EPA notes that some <strong>of</strong> the bases for Newcombe's estimate <strong>of</strong> a genetic risk factor, as<br />

included in draft Table E.3 (p. E.8), are not supported by other studies and have not been<br />

accepted by UNSCEAR. The fact that Newcombe's value "has not been generally accepted" is<br />

noted, as quoted, in the sentence on overlapping draft pp. E.7 and E.8. Newcombe's argu-<br />

ments still carry weight, however, and deserve to be noted as a responsible view, albeit one<br />

which is not employed in the Statement. The EPA also notes in this comment that the BEIR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!