23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SPENT AT REACTOR AWAY FROM<br />

FUEL STORAGE SHIPMENT REACTOR SHIPMENT<br />

STORAGE<br />

4.2<br />

TREATMENT<br />

AND TO DISPOSAL<br />

PACKAGING<br />

- SHIPMENT<br />

FIGURE 4.1.1 Predisposal <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> System for Spent Fuel<br />

in the Once-Through Fuel Cycle<br />

treatment and packaging facility if a disposal facility is available. If a disposal<br />

facility is not available, the fuel is assumed to be shipped to an away-from-reactor (AFR)<br />

storage facility.(a) When a disposal facility is available, the fuel is shipped there for<br />

treatment and packaging prior to disposal. Alternative approaches include having packaging<br />

facilities located separately from disposal facilities with extended storage <strong>of</strong> packaged<br />

fuel before disposal.<br />

The types <strong>of</strong> operations and facilities considered in this Statement for each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

disposal alternatiPes are identified in Table 4.1.1. This table shows that the initial<br />

storage and shipment operations are identical for all <strong>of</strong> the disposal alternatives. The<br />

differences in the predisposal systems are in the treatment and packaging and final shipment<br />

to disposal. Four <strong>of</strong> the eight alternatives to mined geologic disposal can utilize the same<br />

treatment and packaging options as mined geologic disposal; however, three <strong>of</strong> these require<br />

ocean ship transport to the final disposal site. Four <strong>of</strong> the alternatives can only be uti-<br />

lized in the once-through cy .it if the -pent fuel is first dissolved as in a reprocessing<br />

cycle. Two <strong>of</strong> these alternatives require disposal as liquid hý h-level waste. In these two<br />

cases, no shipment to disposal is required because Lre treatment facility and the disposal<br />

facility are located on a common site. The transmutation alternative requires, in addition<br />

(to dissolution <strong>of</strong> the fuel, complex chemical partitioning, target fabrication, and irradia-<br />

tion. Space disposal requires, in addition to dissolution <strong>of</strong> the spent fuel, a process to<br />

convert the liquid waste into an encapsulated solid material. All <strong>of</strong> the alternatives that<br />

utilize a dissolution process would also generate considerable quantities <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous<br />

TRU waste. These would require the same treatment and handling as the comparable wastes<br />

produced in the reprocessing cycle described in the next subsection.<br />

(a) AFR storage facilities were referred to as independent spent fuel storage facilities<br />

(ISFSFs) in DOE/ET-0028 and DOE/ET-0029.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!