23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Draft p. 3.6.8, 9<br />

Issue<br />

367<br />

ALTERNATIVE DISPOSAL CONCEPTS<br />

The Emplacement Section (3.6.2.4) is incomplete and inaccurate.<br />

* The implication is that any drillship or trenching concept would require a second ship<br />

and that no technology is known for doing both hole drilling and emplacement from one<br />

ship. Drillships can certainly do both.<br />

* The section also implies that the penetrometer is simple and accurate. Such is not<br />

the case. It could act like an unguided glider slipping its way down into the sea-<br />

bed. It may s<strong>of</strong>t-land, ricochet <strong>of</strong>f the bottom, or enter at an angle. As a result,<br />

its position may not be known, it may not be retrievable, and it can not be considered<br />

an accurate, simple way to emplace wastes.<br />

The retrievability discussion (3.6.2.6) is misleading. It implies that the penetrome-<br />

ter is easiest, and hole-drilling, the hardest. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, GLOMAR CHALLENGER has<br />

demonstrated time and again in the Deep Sea Drilling Program <strong>of</strong> the National Science Foun-<br />

dation the ability to reenter a drill hole <strong>of</strong> about 18" in diameter at a depth <strong>of</strong> 10,000<br />

feet. On the other hand, retrieval <strong>of</strong> penetrometer emplaced items has not been accomplished<br />

in situ.<br />

Ocean Transportation (Section 3.6.4.5) needs more thought.. The docking facility, not<br />

described, is supposed to be able to handle three ships, each operating on a schedule <strong>of</strong><br />

four trips per year. Given the realities <strong>of</strong> dock utilization, it allows each ship only<br />

about ten days per trip at the dock. There will be a lot <strong>of</strong> times when a second ship will<br />

be waiting at anchorage for dock space. This seems a bad idea for ships handling this kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> material and performing such specialized tasks. (124)<br />

Response<br />

Drillships can certainly be used both for transport, drilling, and emplacement. But<br />

it would not be efficient to use a drillship for transport, in which most <strong>of</strong> its time is<br />

spent going to and from the dock facility.<br />

The penetrometer is not a "glider", making s<strong>of</strong>t landings or ricocheting <strong>of</strong>f the bot-<br />

tom. With a nose and tail fitted, it is guided into the bottom at a predetermined location<br />

and to a predetermined depth. Its position would be known from its time <strong>of</strong> release until<br />

it came to rest because it would be tracked by a transponder array on the bottom. Further-<br />

more, present technology allows accurate position determination.<br />

There is no implication that the penetrometer is easiest and drilling the hardest: it<br />

is stated that the penetrometer is cheapest, and drilling the most expensive. Both are<br />

established facts, having been demonstrated with scale models in the deep ocean. The only<br />

remaining questions relate to the size <strong>of</strong> a penetrometer that can handle the waste, or the<br />

size <strong>of</strong> the drill that can make a hole big enough to hold a canister one foot in diameter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!